2025 Ford Explorer vs 2026 Mazda CX-90

Ford Explorer

$40,050 Β· Crossover

vs
Mazda CX-90

$38,800 Β· Crossover

Comparison Overview

Choosing between the 2025 Ford Explorer and the 2026 Mazda CX-90 often boils down to prioritizing raw power versus standard capability. If you need the punchiest engine, the Explorer delivers 300 hp and 310 lb-ft of torque, beating the CX-90’s 280 hp and 332 lb-ft, though the Mazda offers superior low-end grunt. Surprisingly, the leaner CX-90 achieves a slightly better combined 25 MPG versus the Explorer's 24 MPG, despite the Ford having a smaller base engine in this comparison. The Explorer is shorter in height at 69.9 inches compared to the CX-90's 68.3 inches, but the Mazda is slightly longer overall at 200.8 inches. For pure hauling gear, the Explorer offers significantly more space with 18.2 cu ft of cargo capacity compared to the CX-90's 14.9 cu ft, all starting at an MSRP of $40,050 for the Ford versus the Mazda's $38,800.

Size Comparison

Performance

Fuel Efficiency

Full Specifications

Our Verdicts

πŸš— Best for Commuters

2026 Mazda CX-90

The CX-90's slightly better combined 25 MPG and standard All-Wheel Drive make it slightly more efficient and capable for daily unpredictable commutes.

πŸ‘¨β€πŸ‘©β€πŸ‘§β€πŸ‘¦ Best for Families

2025 Ford Explorer

The 2025 Ford Explorer wins for families due to its substantially larger 18.2 cu ft of cargo capacity compared to the CX-90's 14.9 cu ft.

🏎️ Best for Enthusiasts

2025 Ford Explorer

The Explorer’s higher 300 hp output appeals more directly to driving enthusiasts seeking peak horsepower figures.

πŸ’° Best Value

2026 Mazda CX-90

The Mazda CX-90 provides better fuel economy (25 MPG combined) and standard AWD for $1,250 less than the base Explorer.

Choose the Ford Explorer if...

  • You need maximum utility, as the Explorer offers 18.2 cu ft of cargo space.
  • You prefer Rear Wheel Drive architecture for potentially different handling dynamics.
  • Peak horsepower is important to you, with the Explorer boasting 300 hp.

Choose the Mazda CX-90 if...

  • You prioritize traction in all weather, given the standard All Wheel Drive system.
  • You want better fuel efficiency, achieving 25 MPG combined versus 24 MPG.
  • You are looking for a lower entry price, starting at $38,800.

Key Dimensions

Dimension Ford Explorer Mazda CX-90
Length 198.8" 200.8"
Width 78.9" 78.5"
Height 69.9" 68.3"
Wheelbase 119.1" 122.8"

Features Comparison

Safety
Feature Ford Mazda
Blind Spot Monitor βœ“ βœ“
Lane Departure Warning βœ“ βœ“
Lane Keeping Assist System βœ“ βœ“
Rear Cross Traffic Alert βœ“ βœ“
Driver Attention Alert βœ“ βœ“
Pre-Collision Safety System βœ“ βœ“
Post-Collision Safety System βœ“ βœ“
Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags (with Head Protection Chamber) βœ“ β€”
Front Head Airbags βœ“ βœ“
Rear Head Airbags βœ“ βœ“
Third Row Head Airbags βœ“ βœ“
Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation βœ“ βœ“
Electronic Stability Control βœ“ βœ“
Traction Control System βœ“ βœ“
LATCH System βœ“ βœ“
Rear Door Child Safety Locks βœ“ βœ“
Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) 4-Wheel 4-Wheel
Front Ventilated Disc Brakes βœ“ βœ“
Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes βœ“ βœ“
Brake Preparation System βœ“ βœ“
Brake Assist βœ“ β€”
Tire Pressure Monitoring System βœ“ βœ“
Automatic Headlights βœ“ βœ“
Headlight Delay-Off βœ“ βœ“
LED Headlights βœ“ βœ“
Daytime Running Lights βœ“ βœ“
Front Headrests 2 2
Front Height Adjustable Headrests βœ“ βœ“
Rear Headrests 2 3
Rear Height Adjustable Headrests βœ“ βœ“
Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) βœ“ β€”
Engine Immobilizer βœ“ βœ“
Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags β€” βœ“
Self-Leveling Headlights β€” βœ“
Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors β€” βœ“
Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt β€” βœ“
Engine
Feature Ford Mazda
Base Engine Displacement 2.3 L 3.3 L
Number of Cylinders inline 4 inline 6
Base Engine Type gas mild hybrid
Horsepower 300 hp @ 5500 rpm 280 hp @ 5000 rpm
Torque 310 lb-ft @ 3500 rpm 332 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm
Number of Valves 16 24
Camshaft Type Double overhead cam (DOHC) Double overhead cam (DOHC)
Variable Valve Timing Variable Variable
Fuel Injection Type βœ“ βœ“
Drive Train
Feature Ford Mazda
Transmission Type 10-speed automatic 8-speed shiftable automatic
Drivetrain Type rear wheel drive all wheel drive
Center Differential Type β€” Limited Slip
Hill Descent Control β€” βœ“
Fuel
Feature Ford Mazda
Fuel Type regular unleaded regular unleaded
EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) 20/29 MPG 23/28 MPG
EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) 24 MPG 25 MPG
EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) 358.0/519.1 mi. 425.5/518.0 mi.
Fuel Tank Capacity 17.9 gal. 18.5 gal.
Comfort & Convenience
Feature Ford Mazda
Push Button Start βœ“ βœ“
Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel βœ“ βœ“
Audio Controls on Steering Wheel βœ“ βœ“
Cruise Control on Steering Wheel βœ“ βœ“
Electric Power Steering βœ“ βœ“
Rear View Camera βœ“ βœ“
Rear Parking Sensors βœ“ β€”
Adaptive Cruise Control βœ“ βœ“
Front Cupholders βœ“ βœ“
Rear Cupholders βœ“ βœ“
3rd Row Cupholders βœ“ βœ“
Front Door Pockets βœ“ βœ“
Rear Door Pockets βœ“ βœ“
Overhead Console with Storage βœ“ βœ“
Front Seatback Storage βœ“ βœ“
Manual Rear Seat Easy Entry βœ“ βœ“
Three Zone Climate Control βœ“ βœ“
Rear Ventilation Ducts with Fan Control βœ“ β€”
Interior Air Filtration βœ“ βœ“
Dual Vanity Mirrors βœ“ βœ“
Transmission Controls on Steering Wheel β€” βœ“
Leather Steering Wheel β€” βœ“
Rear Ventilation Ducts β€” βœ“
Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors β€” βœ“
In Car Entertainment
Feature Ford Mazda
AM/FM Stereo βœ“ βœ“
Speaker System 6 8
Android Auto (Wired) βœ“ βœ“
Apple CarPlay (Wired) βœ“ βœ“
USB Port βœ“ βœ“
USB Port with External Media Control βœ“ βœ“
Satellite Radio βœ“ β€”
Satellite Radio Trial Period 3 months β€”
Speed Sensitive Volume Control βœ“ βœ“
Infotainment Display β€” 10.3 in
Memory Card Slot β€” βœ“
Power Feature
Feature Ford Mazda
One-Touch Power Windows 2 4
Keyless Entry βœ“ βœ“
Heated Mirrors βœ“ βœ“
Frontseats
Feature Ford Mazda
Front Head Room 40.7 in. 39.7 in.
Front Leg Room 43.0 in. 41.7 in.
Front Shoulder Room 61.8 in. 59.2 in.
Front Hip Room 59.2 in. 56.2 in.
Seat Material: Premium Cloth βœ“ β€”
Front Seat Type: Bucket βœ“ βœ“
Driver Seat Power Adjustments 8-way 8-way
Driver Seat Height Adjustment βœ“ βœ“
Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments 4-way 4-way
Seat Material: Leatherette β€” βœ“
Driver Seat Lumbar Support β€” Power
Rearseats
Feature Ford Mazda
Rear Head Room 40.5 in. 39.3 in.
Rear Leg Room 39.0 in. 39.4 in.
Rear Shoulder Room 61.9 in. 58.1 in.
Rear Hip Room 59.1 in. 55.5 in.
Folding Rear Seatback βœ“ β€”
Reclining Rear Seats βœ“ βœ“
Folding Center Armrest βœ“ βœ“
Manual Folding Third Row Seat βœ“ βœ“
Split-Folding Rear Seatback β€” βœ“
Tires and Wheels
Feature Ford Mazda
Wheel Finish Painted Alloy β€”
Wheel Diameter 18 in β€”
Tire Type All Season All Season
Tire Size P255/65R18 265/55R19
Spare Tire Type Temporary Temporary
Spare Tire Location Underbody Mounted Inside Mounted
Wheel Material β€” Alloy
Wheel Size β€” 19 x 8.5 in
Suspension
Feature Ford Mazda
Four-Wheel Independent Suspension βœ“ βœ“
Front Stabilizer Bar βœ“ β€”
Rear Stabilizer Bar βœ“ β€”
Stabilizer Bar β€” βœ“
Warranty
Feature Ford Mazda
Basic Warranty 3 yr./ 36000 mi. 3 yr./ 36000 mi.
Drivetrain Warranty 5 yr./ 60000 mi. 5 yr./ 60000 mi.
Corrosion/Rust Warranty 5 yr./ unlimited mi. 5 yr./ unlimited mi.
Roadside Assistance 5 yr./ 60000 mi. 3 yr./ 36000 mi.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about comparing the 2025 Ford Explorer and 2026 Mazda CX-90.

Which crossover is better for towing based on these specs?

While neither vehicle's towing capacity is explicitly listed, the Explorer's superior 300 hp and 310 lb-ft of torque generally suggest a higher towing ceiling compared to the CX-90’s power figures.

Is the difference in engine specs significant for daily driving?

The CX-90 has higher torque (332 lb-ft vs. 310 lb-ft), which aids in feeling quicker off the line at lower city speeds, even though the Explorer has higher peak horsepower (300 hp vs. 280 hp).

How does the driving feel differ based on the drive type?

The Ford Explorer utilizes Rear Wheel Drive as standard, which often provides a sportier feel and better balance, whereas the CX-90’s standard All Wheel Drive prioritizes stability and grip, especially in slippery conditions.

Which vehicle offers more room inside?

The Ford Explorer wins significantly on rear cargo volume, providing 18.2 cubic feet, which is over 3 cubic feet more than the Mazda CX-90’s 14.9 cubic feet.

Are the transmissions comparable?

The Explorer comes equipped with a 10-speed automatic transmission, while the CX-90 uses an 8-speed shiftable automatic; both are geared for efficiency but the Explorer has more ratios to work with.

How does the initial cost compare?

The 2026 Mazda CX-90 has a more accessible starting MSRP of $38,800, beating the 2025 Ford Explorer's $40,050 base price.

More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)

View all

Vehicle Details

Compare More Vehicles

Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once

Open Comparison Tool