2025 Ford Explorer vs 2026 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Comparison Overview
The most significant numerical disparity between the 2025 Ford Explorer and the 2026 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is the $9,850 difference in Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price (MSRP), with the Explorer starting at $40,050 compared to the Evoque's $49,900. Power figures also show a considerable gap, as the Explorer delivers 300 hp and 310 lb-ft of torque, significantly outperforming the Evoque's 246 hp and 269 lb-ft. Fuel economy is comparable, with the Explorer achieving 24 MPG combined versus the Evoque's 22 MPG combined, though the Explorer requires regular unleaded fuel while the Evoque mandates premium. Size is another major factor: the Explorer measures 198.8 inches long, substantially longer than the Evoque's 172.1 inches. Despite its smaller external dimensions, the Evoque offers a slightly larger cargo volume at 21.4 cubic feet compared to the Explorer's 18.2 cubic feet with the third row stowed or unavailable.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2025 Ford Explorer
The Ford Explorer's superior combined MPG rating of 24 offers better long-term running efficiency for daily travel.
2025 Ford Explorer
The 198.8-inch length of the Explorer likely translates to superior passenger and third-row volume over the shorter 172.1-inch Evoque.
2025 Ford Explorer
With 300 hp and 310 lb-ft of torque, the Explorer provides substantially greater performance output than the Evoque's 246 hp and 269 lb-ft.
2025 Ford Explorer
The Explorer commands a $9,850 lower entry price while simultaneously delivering higher power and fuel economy metrics.
Choose the Ford Explorer if...
- You prioritize higher power, specifically needing the 300 horsepower output.
- Budget is a primary concern, leveraging the $40,050 MSRP entry point.
- You require the advantage of rear-wheel drive architecture or a longer vehicle frame measuring 198.8 inches.
Choose the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque if...
- You prefer the traction benefits and standard nature of All-Wheel Drive (AWD).
- Maximum inherent cargo volume is critical, as the Evoque provides 21.4 cubic feet.
- A more compact footprint (172.1 inches long) is necessary for urban maneuvering, despite the premium fuel requirement.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Ford Explorer | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 198.8" | 172.1" |
| Width | 78.9" | - |
| Height | 69.9" | 64.9" |
| Wheelbase | 119.1" | 105.6" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Ford | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Blind Spot Monitor | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Departure Warning | ✓ | — |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Attention Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | ✓ | — |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags (with Head Protection Chamber) | ✓ | — |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Third Row Head Airbags | ✓ | — |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | — |
| Brake Preparation System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Brake Assist | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | ✓ | ✓ |
| LED Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Headrests | 2 | 3 |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | — |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Engine Immobilizer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | — | ✓ |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | — | ✓ |
| Self-Leveling Headlights | — | ✓ |
| Front Fog Lights | — | ✓ |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | — | ✓ |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Ford | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 2.3 L | 2.0 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 4 | inline 4 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | gas |
| Horsepower | 300 hp @ 5500 rpm | 246 hp @ 5500 rpm |
| Torque | 310 lb-ft @ 3500 rpm | 269 lb-ft @ 1300 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 16 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | ✓ | ✓ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Ford | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 10-speed automatic | 9-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | rear wheel drive | all wheel drive |
| Hill Descent Control | — | ✓ |
Fuel
| Feature | Ford | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | regular unleaded | premium unleaded (recommended) |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 20/29 MPG | 20/27 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 24 MPG | 22 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 358.0/519.1 mi. | 354.0/477.9 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 17.9 gal. | 17.7 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Ford | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | — |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Parking Sensors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| 3rd Row Cupholders | ✓ | — |
| Front Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Seatback Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Manual Rear Seat Easy Entry | ✓ | — |
| Three Zone Climate Control | ✓ | — |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts with Fan Control | ✓ | — |
| Interior Air Filtration | ✓ | — |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Power Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Transmission Controls on Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Front Parking Sensors | — | ✓ |
| Wireless Charging Pad | — | ✓ |
| Universal Remote Transmitter | — | ✓ |
| Leather Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Heated Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Dual Zone Climate Control | — | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | — | ✓ |
| Auto-Dimming Rearview Mirror | — | ✓ |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | — | ✓ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Ford | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speaker System | 6 | 12 |
| Android Auto (Wired) | ✓ | — |
| Apple CarPlay (Wired) | ✓ | — |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | ✓ | — |
| Satellite Radio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | 3 months | 3 months |
| Speed Sensitive Volume Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Infotainment Display | — | 11.4 in |
| Meridian Speakers | — | ✓ |
| Stereo Power | — | 400W |
| Subwoofer Count | — | 1 |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | — | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | — | ✓ |
Power Feature
| Feature | Ford | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 2 | 4 |
| Keyless Entry | ✓ | ✓ |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Moonroof Type | — | 1st Row Power Glass |
Frontseats
| Feature | Ford | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 40.7 in. | 37.4 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 43.0 in. | 40.0 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 61.8 in. | 56.6 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 59.2 in. | — |
| Seat Material: Premium Cloth | ✓ | — |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Power Adjustments | 8-way | 8-way |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 4-way | — |
| Seat Material: Leather | — | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Lumbar Support | — | Power |
| Driver Seat Memory Settings | — | 3 |
| Passenger Seat Power Adjustments | — | 6-way |
| Passenger Seat Height Adjustment | — | ✓ |
| Passenger Seat Lumbar Support | — | Power |
| Driver Seat Heating | — | Multi-level |
| Passenger Seat Heating | — | Multi-level |
Rearseats
| Feature | Ford | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 40.5 in. | 38.1 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 39.0 in. | 34.0 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 61.9 in. | 55.4 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 59.1 in. | — |
| Folding Rear Seatback | ✓ | — |
| Reclining Rear Seats | ✓ | — |
| Folding Center Armrest | ✓ | ✓ |
| Manual Folding Third Row Seat | ✓ | — |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | — | ✓ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Ford | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Finish | Painted Alloy | — |
| Wheel Diameter | 18 in | — |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | P255/65R18 | R18 |
| Spare Tire Type | Temporary | Temporary |
| Spare Tire Location | Underbody Mounted | Inside Mounted |
| Wheel Material | — | Alloy |
| Wheel Size | — | 18 x 8.0 in |
Suspension
| Feature | Ford | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | ✓ |
Warranty
| Feature | Ford | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 6 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Ford Explorer and 2026 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
What is the significance of the difference in drive type between the two crossovers?
The 2025 Ford Explorer utilizes a standard rear-wheel drive (RWD) platform, whereas the 2026 Range Rover Evoque comes standard with all-wheel drive (AWD). This means the Evoque offers consistent traction benefits in varied conditions, while the Explorer maintains a conventional RWD setup.
How do the fuel requirements impact the cost of ownership?
The Explorer uses regular unleaded fuel, which typically costs less per gallon than the premium unleaded fuel recommended for the Evoque. This difference, combined with the Explorer's slightly higher 24 MPG combined rating, suggests lower operational fuel costs.
Is the Range Rover Evoque significantly smaller than the Explorer?
Yes, the dimensions reveal a substantial size difference; the Evoque is 172.1 inches long, making it nearly 27 inches shorter than the Explorer's 198.8 inches. However, the shorter Evoque manages to maximize its internal space, offering 21.4 cu ft of cargo capacity versus the Explorer's 18.2 cu ft.
Which vehicle offers a better performance advantage based purely on engine specifications?
The Ford Explorer decisively leads in raw power output, producing 300 horsepower and 310 lb-ft of torque through its 10-speed automatic transmission. The Evoque offers 246 horsepower and 269 lb-ft of torque, representing a 54 hp deficit.
How does the base MSRP disparity affect the overall purchase decision?
The $9,850 price gap is substantial, positioning the Explorer nearly $10,000 less expensive than the Evoque upon initial purchase. This mandates that the Evoque must deliver significant added value in luxury or features to justify the higher $49,900 starting price.
Do the transmissions differ substantially between the two models?
The Explorer utilizes a 10-speed automatic transmission, providing an extra ratio for optimized performance and efficiency tuning. Conversely, the Evoque features a 9-speed shiftable automatic transmission.
More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool