2025 Ford Expedition vs 2026 Toyota Sequoia
Comparison Overview
The most significant divergence between the 2025 Ford Expedition (Car 1) and the 2026 Toyota Sequoia (Car 2) is fuel economy, with the Sequoia achieving a 4 MPG higher combined rating (22 MPG vs. 18 MPG). This efficiency advantage comes despite the Sequoia boasting superior raw power, registering 437 horsepower and 583 lb-ft of torque, significantly eclipsing the Expedition's 400 hp and 480 lb-ft of torque. However, the Expedition maintains a substantial financial advantage with an MSRP of $57,400 compared to the Sequoia's $64,025, representing a $6,625 initial cost savings. Both large SUVs feature a 10-speed automatic transmission. While the Expedition uses a slightly less powerful engine configuration, its lower barrier to entry and comparable size metrics—lacking specific Sequoia dimensions beyond length, width, and height—make the trade-off between initial cost and long-term fuel expenditure the core decision point for buyers analyzing these two four-wheel-drive platforms.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2026 Toyota Sequoia
The 2026 Toyota Sequoia wins for commuters due to its superior 22 MPG combined fuel economy, offsetting the higher initial cost for daily driving efficiency.
2026 Toyota Sequoia
The Sequoia's marginally better MPG and potentially superior overall utility, suggested by its 22.3 cu ft cargo capacity, make it the preferred family utility vehicle.
2026 Toyota Sequoia
The Sequoia provides significantly higher performance metrics, delivering 437 hp and 583 lb-ft of torque, outperforming the Expedition's 400 hp and 480 lb-ft.
2025 Ford Expedition
The 2025 Ford Expedition offers substantially better initial value, costing $6,625 less than the Sequoia at the base MSRP ($57,400 vs. $64,025).
Choose the Ford Expedition if...
- Budget is the primary constraint, given the Expedition's $57,400 MSRP which is $6,625 lower than Car 2.
- The operator prefers a slightly less powerful but highly capable 4x4 system featuring 480 lb-ft of torque.
- The cost of running premium unleaded fuel is a concern, as the Expedition requires it while the Sequoia uses regular unleaded.
Choose the Toyota Sequoia if...
- Maximum longitudinal performance is required, as the Sequoia generates 437 hp and 583 lb-ft of torque.
- Fuel savings are prioritized, with the Sequoia delivering 22 combined MPG compared to the Expedition's 18 MPG.
- The maximum possible vehicle footprint is desired, evidenced by the Sequoia's 208.1 inches length and 74.5 inches height.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Ford Expedition | Toyota Sequoia |
|---|---|---|
| Length | - | 208.1" |
| Width | - | 79.8" |
| Height | - | 74.5" |
| Wheelbase | - | 122.0" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Blind Spot Monitor | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Departure Warning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Attention Alert | ✓ | — |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Third Row Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Solid Disc Brakes | ✓ | — |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | ✓ | — |
| Brake Preparation System | ✓ | — |
| Brake Assist | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | ✓ | ✓ |
| LED Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Engine Immobilizer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | — | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes | — | ✓ |
| Front Fog Lights | — | ✓ |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 3.5 L | 3.4 L |
| Number of Cylinders | V6 | V6 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | hybrid |
| Horsepower | 400 hp | 437 hp @ 5200 rpm |
| Torque | 480 lb-ft | 583 lb-ft @ 2400 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 24 | 24 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | ✓ | ✓ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 10-speed shiftable automatic | 10-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | four wheel drive | rear wheel drive |
| Transfer Case Gearing | Electronic Hi-Lo | — |
| Hill Descent Control | ✓ | — |
| Rear Differential Type | — | Limited Slip |
Fuel
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | premium unleaded (recommended) | regular unleaded |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 15/22 MPG | 21/24 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 18 MPG | 22 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 0/0 mi. | 472.5/540.0 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | — | 22.5 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | ✓ | ✓ |
| Power Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | — |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Parking Sensors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Parking Sensors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| 3rd Row Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Seatback Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Leather Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simulated Alloy Trim on Steering Wheel | ✓ | — |
| Three Zone Climate Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts with Fan Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Interior Air Filtration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Front View Camera | — | ✓ |
| Side View Camera | — | ✓ |
| Universal Remote Transmitter | — | ✓ |
| Manual Rear Seat Easy Entry | — | ✓ |
| Auto-Dimming Rearview Mirror | — | ✓ |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | — | ✓ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 24.0 in | 8.0 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speaker System | 6 | 8 |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio | With Real Time Traffic | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | 3 months | 3 months |
| Speed Sensitive Volume Control | ✓ | — |
| Video Monitor | ✓ | — |
Power Feature
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 2 | 4 |
| Remote Keyless Entry | ✓ | — |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Moonroof Type | — | 1st Row Power Glass |
| Keyless Entry | — | ✓ |
| Reverse Tilt Dual Mirrors | — | ✓ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Seat Material: Cloth | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Power Adjustments | 8-way | 8-way |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Lumbar Support | Power | Power |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 4-way | — |
| Front Head Room | — | 39.2 in. |
| Front Leg Room | — | 41.2 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | — | 65.0 in. |
| Front Hip Room | — | 62.6 in. |
| Passenger Seat Power Adjustments | — | 8-way |
| Passenger Seat Height Adjustment | — | ✓ |
| Passenger Seat Lumbar Support | — | Power |
| Driver Seat Heating | — | Multi-level |
| Passenger Seat Heating | — | Multi-level |
Rearseats
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reclining Rear Seats | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Room | — | 38.4 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | — | 39.2 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | — | 61.8 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | — | 60.8 in. |
| Folding Center Armrest | — | ✓ |
| Power Folding Third Row Seat | — | ✓ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Finish | Painted Alloy | — |
| Wheel Size | 18 x 8.5 in | — |
| Tire Type | All Terrain | All Season |
| Tire Size | P265/70R18 | P265/70R18 |
| Spare Tire Type | Full Size Non-Matching | Full Size Non-Matching |
| Spare Tire Location | Underbody Mounted | Underbody Mounted |
| Wheel Material | — | Alloy |
| Wheel Diameter | — | 18 in |
Suspension
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | — | ✓ |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | — | ✓ |
Warranty
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 2 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Hybrid Component Warranty | — | 8 yr./ 100000 mi. |
| Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance | — | 2 yr./ 25000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Ford Expedition and 2026 Toyota Sequoia.
What is the main operational cost difference between the Expedition and the Sequoia?
The primary operational cost difference lies in fuel consumption and fuel type. The 2026 Sequoia achieves 22 MPG combined and uses regular unleaded, while the 2025 Expedition is rated at 18 MPG combined and requires premium unleaded (recommended), leading to higher running costs for the Expedition.
Which SUV provides better towing/power based purely on the provided engine specifications?
The 2026 Toyota Sequoia offers demonstrably better engine output with 437 horsepower and 583 lb-ft of torque. This significantly outmuscles the Ford Expedition's 400 hp and 480 lb-ft of torque.
Is the significant price difference of $6,625 justified by the performance gains in the Sequoia?
Whether the $6,625 premium for the Sequoia is justified depends on priorities; while it gains 37 hp and 4 MPG combined, buyers prioritizing upfront savings will find the Expedition more appealing at $57,400.
How do the drivetrains compare between the two large SUVs?
Both vehicles utilize a 10-speed shiftable automatic transmission for gear management. However, the 2025 Ford Expedition comes standard with four-wheel drive, while the specified 2026 Toyota Sequoia configuration lists rear-wheel drive.
Does the Sequoia's higher price correlate with a larger exterior footprint than the Expedition?
The provided data confirms the Sequoia's large dimensions at 208.1 inches long, 79.8 inches wide, and 74.5 inches high; however, specific comparable dimensions for the Expedition are not listed, making a direct size comparison inconclusive based solely on this data.
How does cargo volume compare between these two large SUVs?
Only the 2026 Toyota Sequoia's cargo capacity is specified at 22.3 cu ft. The corresponding maximum cargo volume figure for the 2025 Ford Expedition is not provided in this comparison data set.
More Premium SUVs ($50k-$80k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool