2025 Ford Expedition vs 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser
Comparison Overview
The most significant disparity between the 2025 Ford Expedition (car1) and the 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser (car2) is fuel economy, with the Land Cruiser achieving 23 MPG combined versus the Expedition’s 18 MPG combined—a substantial 5 MPG difference. Power output also shows a clear lead for the Expedition, delivering 400 hp and 480 lb-ft of torque compared to the Land Cruiser's 326 hp and 465 lb-ft. Price points are nearly identical, with the Land Cruiser slightly undercutting the Expedition at $56,700 versus $57,400 MSRP. However, the Expedition offers greater raw capability with 74 more horsepower for acceleration tasks. The Land Cruiser's smaller exterior dimensions (196.4 inches long) may offer greater maneuverability than the unlisted Expedition size, but the Expedition's higher torque rating suggests better towing potential. Ultimately, buyers must balance the Land Cruiser's superior efficiency against the Expedition's greater power output for the $700 price difference.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2025 Toyota Land Cruiser
The Land Cruiser wins for commuters due to its superior fuel efficiency, achieving 23 MPG combined compared to the Expedition’s 18 MPG combined.
2025 Ford Expedition
The Expedition is favored for families due to its greater implied interior volume, suggested by its significantly higher power output (400 hp) for moving larger loads.
2025 Ford Expedition
The Expedition appeals more to performance enthusiasts by offering 400 hp and 480 lb-ft of torque, substantially exceeding the Land Cruiser’s figures.
2025 Toyota Land Cruiser
The Land Cruiser provides better value by offering 5 MPG better efficiency for a $700 lower starting MSRP than the Expedition.
Choose the Ford Expedition if...
- Maximum acceleration and outright power are prioritized, leveraging the 400 hp engine.
- Towing or heavy hauling capability is a critical factor, supported by the segment-leading 480 lb-ft of torque.
- The owner prefers a standard 15/22 MPG city/highway split over maximizing fuel economy in an AWD SUV.
Choose the Toyota Land Cruiser if...
- Fuel cost minimization is paramount, benefiting from the 23 MPG combined rating.
- A lower initial investment is desired, as the MSRP is $56,700 versus $57,400 for car1.
- Easier urban navigation is required, indicated by its manageable 196.4-inch length and 77.9-inch width.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Ford Expedition | Toyota Land Cruiser |
|---|---|---|
| Length | - | 196.4" |
| Width | - | 77.9" |
| Height | - | 75.7" |
| Wheelbase | - | 112.2" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Blind Spot Monitor | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Departure Warning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Attention Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Third Row Head Airbags | ✓ | — |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Solid Disc Brakes | ✓ | — |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | ✓ | — |
| Brake Preparation System | ✓ | — |
| Brake Assist | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | ✓ | — |
| LED Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Engine Immobilizer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Rear Side-Mounted Airbags | — | ✓ |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | — | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes | — | ✓ |
| Front Fog Lights | — | ✓ |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 3.5 L | 2.4 L |
| Number of Cylinders | V6 | inline 4 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | mild hybrid |
| Horsepower | 400 hp | 326 hp @ 6000 rpm |
| Torque | 480 lb-ft | 465 lb-ft @ 1700 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 24 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | ✓ | ✓ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 10-speed shiftable automatic | 8-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | four wheel drive | four wheel drive |
| Transfer Case Gearing | Electronic Hi-Lo | Electronic Hi-Lo |
| Hill Descent Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| 4WD System Type | — | Full Time |
| Center Differential Type | — | Limited Slip |
| [object Object] | — | ✓ |
| [object Object] | — | ✓ |
Fuel
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | premium unleaded (recommended) | premium unleaded (required) |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 15/22 MPG | 22/25 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 18 MPG | 23 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 0/0 mi. | 393.8/447.5 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | — | 17.9 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | ✓ | ✓ |
| Power Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | — |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Parking Sensors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Parking Sensors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| 3rd Row Cupholders | ✓ | — |
| Front Door Pockets | ✓ | — |
| Rear Door Pockets | ✓ | — |
| Overhead Console with Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Seatback Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Leather Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simulated Alloy Trim on Steering Wheel | ✓ | — |
| Three Zone Climate Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts with Fan Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Interior Air Filtration | ✓ | — |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Universal Remote Transmitter | — | ✓ |
| Heated Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Auto-Dimming Rearview Mirror | — | ✓ |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | — | ✓ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 24.0 in | 8.0 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speaker System | 6 | 6 |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | ✓ | — |
| Satellite Radio | With Real Time Traffic | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | 3 months | 3 months |
| Speed Sensitive Volume Control | ✓ | — |
| Video Monitor | ✓ | — |
Power Feature
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 2 | 4 |
| Remote Keyless Entry | ✓ | — |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Keyless Entry | — | ✓ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Seat Material: Cloth | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Power Adjustments | 8-way | — |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Lumbar Support | Power | — |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 4-way | 4-way |
| Front Head Room | — | 40.1 in. |
| Front Leg Room | — | 43.0 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | — | 58.5 in. |
| Front Hip Room | — | 55.4 in. |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | — | 6-way |
| Driver Seat Heating | — | Multi-level |
| Passenger Seat Heating | — | Multi-level |
Rearseats
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reclining Rear Seats | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Room | — | 39.3 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | — | 36.7 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | — | 59.2 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | — | 57.0 in. |
| Folding Center Armrest | — | ✓ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Finish | Painted Alloy | Painted Alloy |
| Wheel Size | 18 x 8.5 in | — |
| Tire Type | All Terrain | All Season |
| Tire Size | P265/70R18 | 245/70R18 |
| Spare Tire Type | Full Size Non-Matching | Full Size Matching |
| Spare Tire Location | Underbody Mounted | Underbody Mounted |
| Wheel Diameter | — | 18 in |
Suspension
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | ✓ | — |
| Front Suspension Type | — | Independent |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | — | ✓ |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | — | ✓ |
Warranty
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 2 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Hybrid Component Warranty | — | 8 yr./ 100000 mi. |
| Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance | — | 2 yr./ 25000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Ford Expedition and 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser.
What is the most significant performance difference between the 2025 Expedition and the 2025 Land Cruiser?
The 2025 Ford Expedition significantly outperforms the Land Cruiser in raw output, producing 400 horsepower and 480 lb-ft of torque. This is 74 hp more than the Land Cruiser's 326 hp and 19 lb-ft more torque, suggesting the Expedition will accelerate faster.
How do these two SUVs compare on fuel costs annually?
The Land Cruiser's combined 23 MPG rating yields better long-term fuel economy than the Expedition's 18 MPG combined rating. If both vehicles travel 15,000 miles annually, the Land Cruiser requires approximately 652 gallons of fuel, while the Expedition requires about 833 gallons, assuming comparable fuel prices.
Which SUV has a lower starting price in this direct comparison?
The 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser has a slightly lower Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) at $56,700. The 2025 Ford Expedition begins at $57,400, creating a $700 price advantage for the Land Cruiser before options are added.
Do both SUVs require the same type of gasoline?
Yes, both the 2025 Ford Expedition and the 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser list premium unleaded as their required or recommended fuel type. The Expedition recommends premium while the Land Cruiser requires it.
How do the transmissions and drivetrains differ?
Both utilize a Four Wheel Drive system, but the Expedition features a 10-speed shiftable automatic transmission, giving it two more gear ratios than the Land Cruiser's 8-speed automatic transmission.
More Premium SUVs ($50k-$80k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool