2025 Ford Expedition vs 2025 Nissan Armada
Comparison Overview
Deciding between the 2025 Ford Expedition and the 2025 Nissan Armada often comes down to prioritizing raw power versus the established FWD/4WD equation in the full-size SUV segment. Both vehicles start close on price, with the Expedition at $57,400 and the Armada at $57,520. If you need the surefootedness of four-wheel drive every day, the Expedition has you covered, while the Armada defaults to rear-wheel drive. Interestingly, despite the Expedition offering 400 hp and 480 lb-ft of torque, the Armada squeaks out more power with 425 hp and 516 lb-ft of torque. Both models share an identical 18 MPG combined fuel economy rating, though the Expedition edges out slightly in highway driving at 22 MPG versus the Armada's 20 MPG. For sheer brute hauling potential reflected in the torque figures, the Armada pulls ahead, but the Expedition remains the better all-weather tool with its standard 4WD.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2025 Ford Expedition
The Expedition's standard four-wheel drive provides superior capability for variable weather commutes compared to the Armada's RWD setup.
2025 Ford Expedition
While cargo capacity is only listed for the Armada (20.4 cu ft), the Expedition’s more common 4WD setup is generally preferred for family safety in inclement weather.
2025 Nissan Armada
The 2025 Nissan Armada pulls ahead with superior output, boasting 425 horsepower and 516 lb-ft of torque.
2025 Ford Expedition
The Expedition is priced $120 lower at $57,400 while offering 4WD capability that the Armada lacks at its $57,520 starting point.
Choose the Ford Expedition if...
- You prioritize all-weather confidence due to the standard four-wheel drive system.
- You want the most efficient highway cruising potential, rated at 22 MPG.
- You want the lower starting MSRP of $57,400 for a similarly equipped large SUV.
Choose the Nissan Armada if...
- You need the absolute highest torque rating, achieving 516 lb-ft.
- You prefer the feel of a rear-wheel drive platform for everyday driving dynamics.
- You prioritize horsepower, as the Armada delivers 425 hp compared to the Expedition's 400 hp.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Ford Expedition | Nissan Armada |
|---|---|---|
| Length | - | 209.6" |
| Width | - | 83.3" |
| Height | - | 76.6" |
| Wheelbase | - | 121.1" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Ford | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Blind Spot Monitor | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Departure Warning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Attention Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Third Row Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Solid Disc Brakes | ✓ | — |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | ✓ | — |
| Brake Preparation System | ✓ | — |
| Brake Assist | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | ✓ | ✓ |
| LED Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Engine Immobilizer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | — | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes | — | ✓ |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Ford | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 3.5 L | 3.5 L |
| Number of Cylinders | V6 | V6 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | gas |
| Horsepower | 400 hp | 425 hp @ 5600 rpm |
| Torque | 480 lb-ft | 516 lb-ft @ 3600 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 24 | 24 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | ✓ | ✓ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Ford | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 10-speed shiftable automatic | 9-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | four wheel drive | rear wheel drive |
| Transfer Case Gearing | Electronic Hi-Lo | — |
| Hill Descent Control | ✓ | — |
Fuel
| Feature | Ford | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | premium unleaded (recommended) | premium unleaded (recommended) |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 15/22 MPG | 16/20 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 18 MPG | 18 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 0/0 mi. | 377.6/472.0 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | — | 23.6 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Ford | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | ✓ | ✓ |
| Power Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | — |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Parking Sensors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Parking Sensors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| 3rd Row Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | ✓ | — |
| Front Seatback Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Leather Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simulated Alloy Trim on Steering Wheel | ✓ | — |
| Three Zone Climate Control | ✓ | — |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts with Fan Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Interior Air Filtration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Transmission Controls on Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Manual Rear Seat Easy Entry | — | ✓ |
| Dual Zone Climate Control | — | ✓ |
| Rear Climate Control | — | ✓ |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | — | ✓ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Ford | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 24.0 in | 12.3 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speaker System | 6 | 6 |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio | With Real Time Traffic | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | 3 months | 3 months |
| Speed Sensitive Volume Control | ✓ | — |
| Video Monitor | ✓ | — |
| Radio Data System (RDS) | — | ✓ |
Power Feature
| Feature | Ford | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 2 | 2 |
| Remote Keyless Entry | ✓ | — |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Keyless Entry | — | ✓ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Ford | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Seat Material: Cloth | ✓ | — |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Power Adjustments | 8-way | 8-way |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Lumbar Support | Power | — |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 4-way | — |
| Front Head Room | — | 41.6 in. |
| Front Leg Room | — | 43.8 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | — | 64.2 in. |
| Front Hip Room | — | 59.9 in. |
| Seat Material: Leatherette | — | ✓ |
| Passenger Seat Power Adjustments | — | 4-way |
Rearseats
| Feature | Ford | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reclining Rear Seats | ✓ | — |
| Rear Head Room | — | 40.0 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | — | 39.2 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | — | 63.7 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | — | 59.9 in. |
| Folding Center Armrest | — | ✓ |
| Manual Folding Third Row Seat | — | ✓ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Ford | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Finish | Painted Alloy | — |
| Wheel Size | 18 x 8.5 in | 18 x 8.0 in |
| Tire Type | All Terrain | All Season |
| Tire Size | P265/70R18 | 265/70R18 |
| Spare Tire Type | Full Size Non-Matching | Full Size Non-Matching |
| Spare Tire Location | Underbody Mounted | Underbody Mounted |
| Wheel Material | — | Alloy |
Suspension
| Feature | Ford | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | — | ✓ |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | — | ✓ |
Warranty
| Feature | Ford | Nissan |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance | — | 2 yr./ 24000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Ford Expedition and 2025 Nissan Armada.
Is there a significant fuel economy difference between the 2025 Expedition and the 2025 Armada?
No, both vehicles share an identical 18 MPG combined rating. However, the Expedition offers a slight edge on the highway, achieving 22 MPG versus the Armada's 20 MPG.
Which vehicle is more powerful based on the engine specifications?
The 2025 Nissan Armada has the higher output, delivering 425 horsepower and 516 lb-ft of torque, beating the Ford Expedition's 400 hp and 480 lb-ft.
What is the primary mechanical difference in the standard drivetrain setup?
The Ford Expedition comes standard with four-wheel drive (4WD), whereas the Nissan Armada utilizes a rear-wheel drive (RWD) platform as its base.
Are these two large SUVs similar in size?
They are comparable, but the Armada is listed with exterior dimensions, measuring 209.6 inches long and 83.3 inches wide, while the Expedition's dimensions are not explicitly provided here.
How do their starting prices compare?
The prices are extremely close; the Expedition starts at $57,400, while the Armada has a marginally higher starting MSRP of $57,520.
Does one vehicle offer more practical cargo space?
Based on the provided specs, only the 2025 Nissan Armada has a listed cargo capacity figure, which is 20.4 cubic feet.
More Premium SUVs ($50k-$80k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool