2025 Ford Expedition vs 2025 Land Rover Range Rover Velar
Comparison Overview
Deciding between massive capability and streamlined efficiency often confuses large SUV buyers. If you are looking at the 2025 Ford Expedition (starting at $57,400) versus the 2025 Land Rover Range Rover Velar ($61,500), the choice hinges on purpose. The Expedition dwarfs the Velar in power, boasting 400 hp and 480 lb-ft of torque, making it the brute force option against the Velar's 247 hp. However, that power comes at a cost: the Expedition returns a combined 18 MPG, significantly lower than the Velar's 23 MPG combined rating. While the Expedition provides superior raw output and likely more interior volume (though not fully specified here), the Velar offers better efficiency and a lower profile for city driving. Buyers must weigh the Expedition's sheer muscle against the Velar's $4,100 lower entry price, factoring in the 5 MPG efficiency gap.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2025 Land Rover Range Rover Velar
The Range Rover Velar is the better commuter due to its superior 23 MPG combined fuel economy compared to the Expedition's 18 MPG.
2025 Ford Expedition
The Expedition, being a full-size SUV, typically offers more crucial interior space and substantial towing capability, appealing directly to larger family needs.
2025 Ford Expedition
The Expedition delivers substantially higher performance with 400 hp and 480 lb-ft of torque, far outpacing the Velarβs output.
2025 Land Rover Range Rover Velar
Despite the Expedition having more power, the Velar is $4,100 cheaper upfront and saves money long-term via better fuel efficiency.
Choose the Ford Expedition if...
- You prioritize maximum available power, indicated by the Expedition's 400 horsepower and 480 lb-ft of torque.
- You require a true four-wheel drive system built for heavy-duty applications.
- Your driving often involves towing or hauling where the Expeditionβs robust build will be necessary.
Choose the Land Rover Range Rover Velar if...
- You want to spend $4,100 less upfront, as the Velar has a lower MSRP of $61,500.
- Fuel economy is crucial, given the Velar achieves 23 MPG combined versus the Expeditionβs 18 MPG.
- You prefer a more manageable vehicle profile for urban environments, noted by the Velarβs smaller dimensions (188.9 inches long).
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Ford Expedition | Land Rover Range Rover Velar |
|---|---|---|
| Length | - | 188.9" |
| Width | - | - |
| Height | - | 66.3" |
| Wheelbase | - | 113.0" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Ford | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Blind Spot Monitor | β | β |
| Lane Departure Warning | β | β |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | β | β |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | β | β |
| Driver Attention Alert | β | β |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | β | β |
| Post-Collision Safety System | β | β |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | β | β |
| Front Head Airbags | β | β |
| Rear Head Airbags | β | β |
| Third Row Head Airbags | β | β |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | β | β |
| Electronic Stability Control | β | β |
| Traction Control System | β | β |
| LATCH System | β | β |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | β | β |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Solid Disc Brakes | β | β |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | β | β |
| Brake Preparation System | β | β |
| Brake Assist | β | β |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | β | β |
| Automatic Headlights | β | β |
| Headlight Delay-Off | β | β |
| LED Headlights | β | β |
| Daytime Running Lights | β | β |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | β | β |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | β | β |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | β | β |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | β | β |
| Engine Immobilizer | β | β |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | β | β |
| Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes | β | β |
Engine
| Feature | Ford | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 3.5 L | 2.0 L |
| Number of Cylinders | V6 | inline 4 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | gas |
| Horsepower | 400 hp | 247 hp @ 5000 rpm |
| Torque | 480 lb-ft | 269 lb-ft @ 1300 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 24 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | β | β |
Drive Train
| Feature | Ford | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 10-speed shiftable automatic | 8-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | four wheel drive | all wheel drive |
| Transfer Case Gearing | Electronic Hi-Lo | Electronic Single-Speed |
| Hill Descent Control | β | β |
Fuel
| Feature | Ford | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | premium unleaded (recommended) | premium unleaded (recommended) |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 15/22 MPG | 22/26 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 18 MPG | 23 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 0/0 mi. | 475.2/561.6 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | β | 21.6 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Ford | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | β | β |
| Power Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | β | β |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | β | β |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | β | β |
| Electric Power Steering | β | β |
| Rear View Camera | β | β |
| Front Parking Sensors | β | β |
| Rear Parking Sensors | β | β |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | β | β |
| Front Cupholders | β | β |
| Rear Cupholders | β | β |
| 3rd Row Cupholders | β | β |
| Front Door Pockets | β | β |
| Rear Door Pockets | β | β |
| Overhead Console with Storage | β | β |
| Front Seatback Storage | β | β |
| Leather Steering Wheel | β | β |
| Simulated Alloy Trim on Steering Wheel | β | β |
| Three Zone Climate Control | β | β |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts with Fan Control | β | β |
| Interior Air Filtration | β | β |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | β | β |
| Transmission Controls on Steering Wheel | β | β |
| Wireless Charging Pad | β | β |
| Universal Remote Transmitter | β | β |
| Heated Steering Wheel | β | β |
| Dual Zone Climate Control | β | β |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | β | β |
| Auto-Dimming Rearview Mirror | β | β |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Ford | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 24.0 in | 11.4 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | β | β |
| Speaker System | 6 | 11 |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | β | β |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | β | β |
| USB Port | β | β |
| USB Port with External Media Control | β | β |
| Satellite Radio | With Real Time Traffic | With Real Time Traffic |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | 3 months | 3 months |
| Speed Sensitive Volume Control | β | β |
| Video Monitor | β | β |
| Meridian Speakers | β | β |
| Stereo Power | β | 400W |
| Subwoofer Count | β | 1 |
Power Feature
| Feature | Ford | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 2 | 4 |
| Remote Keyless Entry | β | β |
| Heated Mirrors | β | β |
| Moonroof Type | β | 1st Row Power Glass Extended |
| Keyless Entry | β | β |
Frontseats
| Feature | Ford | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Seat Material: Cloth | β | β |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | β | β |
| Driver Seat Power Adjustments | 8-way | 8-way |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | β | β |
| Driver Seat Lumbar Support | Power | Power |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 4-way | 2-way |
| Front Head Room | β | 38.2 in. |
| Front Leg Room | β | 40.3 in. |
| Seat Material: Leather | β | β |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | β | 2-way |
| Driver Seat Memory Settings | β | 3 |
| Passenger Seat Power Adjustments | β | 8-way |
| Passenger Seat Height Adjustment | β | β |
| Passenger Seat Lumbar Support | β | Power |
| Driver Seat Heating | β | Multi-level |
| Passenger Seat Heating | β | Multi-level |
Rearseats
| Feature | Ford | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | β | β |
| Reclining Rear Seats | β | β |
| Rear Head Room | β | 38.0 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | β | 37.2 in. |
| Folding Center Armrest | β | β |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Ford | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Finish | Painted Alloy | β |
| Wheel Size | 18 x 8.5 in | β |
| Tire Type | All Terrain | All Season |
| Tire Size | P265/70R18 | β |
| Spare Tire Type | Full Size Non-Matching | Temporary |
| Spare Tire Location | Underbody Mounted | Inside Mounted |
| Wheel Material | β | Alloy |
| Wheel Diameter | β | 19 in |
Suspension
| Feature | Ford | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | β | β |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | β | β |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | β | β |
Warranty
| Feature | Ford | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 6 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Ford Expedition and 2025 Land Rover Range Rover Velar.
Which vehicle is significantly more powerful for highway merging and passing?
The 2025 Ford Expedition is the clear performance winner, offering 400 hp and 480 lb-ft of torque. This represents a 153 hp advantage over the Range Rover Velarβs 247 hp.
How much will driving the Expedition versus the Velar cost me in fuel over a year?
The Velar offers better long-term fuel savings, achieving 23 MPG combined while the Expedition only manages 18 MPG combined. This 5 MPG difference adds up quickly, especially since both recommend premium fuel.
Is the higher price tag of the Velar justified compared to the Expedition?
The Velar starts at $61,500, which is $4,100 more than the Expedition's $57,400 MSRP. Value-wise, the Velar wins if efficiency and a lower entry cost are prioritized over sheer power.
Which vehicle is likely better for long road trips requiring lots of luggage?
While specific cargo numbers are close, the Expedition, being a full-size SUV, generally offers superior overall capacity compared to the Velarβs stated 30.9 cu ft.
Are the drive systems comparable between the two models?
No, the Expedition features a four-wheel drive system, while the Velar utilizes all-wheel drive, suggesting different capabilities when encountering severe weather or off-road scenarios.
Does the Velar's lower horsepower mean a less engaging driving experience?
While the Velar has less raw horsepower (247 hp vs. 400 hp), its lower curb weight (implied by its crossover body type) might provide agility, though enthusiasts will likely prefer the Expedition's superior torque.
More Premium SUVs ($50k-$80k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool