2025 Ford Escape vs 2026 Mazda CX-50
Comparison Overview
The 2025 Ford Escape bursts onto the scene prioritizing efficiency, sipping regular unleaded for a class-leading 30 MPG combined, significantly beating the 2026 Mazda CX-50's 26 MPG combined. The Escape's 180 hp and 199 lb-ft of torque offer smooth, city-friendly performance wrapped in a slightly narrower 74.1-inch frame. Conversely, the CX-50 excites with a sportier edge, boasting 187 hp and standard All-Wheel Drive (AWD), though its efficiency dips slightly. While the CX-50 sacrifices efficiency, it offers greater length at 185.8 inches and a more traditional, driver-focused feel with its 6-speed shiftable automatic. The Escape starts marginally cheaper at $29,515 versus the CX-50's $29,900, but its highway mileage of 34 MPG is a huge draw against the CX-50's 30 MPG.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2025 Ford Escape
The 2025 Ford Escape is the superior commuter vehicle due to its segment-leading 30 MPG combined fuel economy.
2025 Ford Escape
The Escape offers superior practicality for families with 37.5 cubic feet of cargo space compared to the CX-50's 31.4 cubic feet.
2026 Mazda CX-50
The 2026 Mazda CX-50 appeals more to driving enthusiasts with standard AWD and 187 horsepower.
2025 Ford Escape
The Ford Escape wins on value by delivering 4 MPG better fuel economy for a slightly lower initial MSRP of $29,515.
Choose the Ford Escape if...
- Your primary concern is minimizing fuel stops, benefiting from 34 MPG highway compared to the CX-50's 30 MPG.
- You need maximum flexible storage, leveraging the Escape's superior 37.5 cu ft of cargo capacity.
- You prioritize lower running costs, stemming from its better efficiency and $400 lower starting MSRP of $29,515.
Choose the Mazda CX-50 if...
- You demand all-weather security and better traction from standard All-Wheel Drive.
- You seek a slightly more potent output with 187 horsepower versus the Escape's 180 hp.
- You prefer the engagement of a 6-speed shiftable automatic transmission for a sportier feel.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Ford Escape | Mazda CX-50 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 180.1" | 185.8" |
| Width | 74.1" | 75.6" |
| Height | 66.0" | 63.5" |
| Wheelbase | 106.7" | 110.8" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Blind Spot Monitor | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Departure Warning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Attention Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Brake Preparation System | ✓ | — |
| Brake Assist | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | ✓ | ✓ |
| LED Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Engine Immobilizer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | — | ✓ |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 1.5 L | 2.5 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 3 | inline 4 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | gas |
| Horsepower | 180 hp @ 6000 rpm | 187 hp @ 6000 rpm |
| Torque | 199 lb-ft @ 3000 rpm | 185 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 12 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cylinder Deactivation | ✓ | ✓ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 8-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | front wheel drive | all wheel drive |
Fuel
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 27/34 MPG | 24/30 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 30 MPG | 26 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 399.6/503.2 mi. | 381.6/477.0 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 14.8 gal. | 15.9 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control | ✓ | — |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Seatback Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Steering Wheel Material | Alloy | — |
| Dual Zone Climate Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Interior Air Filtration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless Charging Pad | — | ✓ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | — | ✓ |
| Leather Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | — | ✓ |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | — | ✓ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 8.0 in | 10.3 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speaker System | 6 | 8 |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | ✓ | — |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | ✓ | — |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio | ✓ | — |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | 3 months | — |
| Speed Sensitive Volume Control | ✓ | — |
| Android Auto (Wired) | — | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wired) | — | ✓ |
Power Feature
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 1 | 4 |
| Keyless Entry | ✓ | ✓ |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 40.0 in. | 39.1 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 42.4 in. | 41.7 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 57.6 in. | 55.9 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 55.2 in. | 53.6 in. |
| Seat Material: Premium Cloth | ✓ | — |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | 6-way | 6-way |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 4-way | 4-way |
| Seat Material: Leatherette | — | ✓ |
Rearseats
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 39.3 in. | 38.6 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 40.7 in. | 39.8 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 56.0 in. | 53.6 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 53.3 in. | 52.1 in. |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | ✓ | ✓ |
| Folding Center Armrest | ✓ | ✓ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Finish | Painted Alloy | Painted Alloy |
| Wheel Diameter | 17 in | — |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | 225/65R H | P225/65R17 |
| Wheel Size | — | 17 x 7.0 in |
| Spare Tire Type | — | Temporary |
| Spare Tire Location | — | Inside Mounted |
Suspension
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | ✓ | — |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | — |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | — |
| Front Suspension Type | — | Independent |
| Stabilizer Bar | — | ✓ |
Warranty
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Ford Escape and 2026 Mazda CX-50.
How significant is the fuel economy difference between the 2025 Escape and the 2026 CX-50?
The difference is substantial; the Ford Escape delivers a 30 MPG combined rating, achieving 4 MPG more than the Mazda CX-50's 26 MPG combined. This translates to fewer stops at the pump for Escape owners.
Which crossover is physically larger for passengers and cargo?
The 2025 Ford Escape provides significantly more storage room, boasting 37.5 cubic feet of cargo capacity compared to the 2026 Mazda CX-50's 31.4 cubic feet. However, the CX-50 is longer overall at 185.8 inches.
Does the Mazda CX-50 offer better driving dynamics based on specs?
Yes, the CX-50 leans toward enthusiast driving by including standard All-Wheel Drive and offering 187 horsepower. The Escape is FWD standard and produces 180 horsepower.
How do the initial price points compare for these two crossovers?
The 2025 Ford Escape has a slight edge with an MSRP of $29,515, making it $385 less expensive than the 2026 Mazda CX-50, which starts at $29,900.
What is the benefit of the Escape's 8-speed automatic transmission over the CX-50's 6-speed unit?
While both use automatic transmissions, the Escape’s 8-speed is engineered to maximize its efficiency, aiding its impressive 34 MPG highway rating. The CX-50's 6-speed is designed to offer a more direct, shiftable feel for driving enthusiasts.
Are the performance metrics very different between these two vehicles?
The CX-50 holds a small advantage in peak power with 187 hp versus the Escape's 180 hp, but the Escape counters this with 14 lb-ft more torque (199 vs. 185 lb-ft), suggesting better low-end grunt for city driving.
More Budget SUVs Under $30,000
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool