2025 Ford Bronco vs 2026 Mazda CX-70
Comparison Overview
Picking between rugged capability and on-road refinement is a tough call when comparing the 2025 Ford Bronco and the 2026 Mazda CX-70. Buyers often struggle when one option prioritizes adventure while the other nails daily usability. The Bronco starts cheaper at $38,995 but demands a thirstier diet, achieving only 19 MPG combined, and requires premium fuel for its 300 hp engine paired with a 7-speed manual transmission. Conversely, the longer 200.8-inch CX-70 costs $3,255 more, currently sitting at $42,250, yet it sips fuel much more efficiently at 25 MPG combined on regular unleaded, thanks to its 280 hp engine and automatic gearbox. While the Bronco offers a tight 20.6 cu ft of cargo space, the CX-70 dwarfs it with 39.6 cu ft, making it a far more practical choice for hauling gear or weekly shopping trips across the suburbs.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2026 Mazda CX-70
The 2026 Mazda CX-70 wins due to its superior 25 MPG combined efficiency compared to the Bronco's 19 MPG, making daily driving far less expensive.
2026 Mazda CX-70
The CX-70 is the clear family winner, offering nearly double the cargo capacity at 39.6 cu ft versus the Bronco's 20.6 cu ft.
2025 Ford Bronco
The 2025 Ford Bronco appeals more to driving enthusiasts with its rugged 4WD system, higher 325 lb-ft torque figure, and engaging 7-speed manual transmission.
2025 Ford Bronco
Despite lower efficiency, the Bronco offers better immediate value starting at $38,995, undercutting the CX-70 by $3,255.
Choose the Ford Bronco if...
- You specifically want the engagement of a 7-speed manual transmission paired with 300 hp.
- Your budget requires a lower initial MSRP, starting at $38,995.
- You need the superior ground clearance and dedicated four-wheel drive capability for serious off-roading.
Choose the Mazda CX-70 if...
- Fuel savings are a priority, evidenced by the 25 MPG combined rating versus the Bronco's 19 MPG.
- You need significant storage, as the CX-70 provides 39.6 cu ft of cargo space.
- You prefer running on regular unleaded fuel and want the smoother operation of an 8-speed automatic transmission.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Ford Bronco | Mazda CX-70 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 173.7" | 200.8" |
| Width | 75.9" | - |
| Height | 71.9" | 68.2" |
| Wheelbase | 100.4" | 122.8" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | ✓ | — |
| Brake Preparation System | ✓ | — |
| Brake Assist | ✓ | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | ✓ | ✓ |
| LED Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Rear Headrests | 2 | 3 |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | ✓ | — |
| Blind Spot Monitor | — | ✓ |
| Lane Departure Warning | — | ✓ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | — | ✓ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | — | ✓ |
| Driver Attention Alert | — | ✓ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | — | ✓ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | — | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes | — | ✓ |
| Self-Leveling Headlights | — | ✓ |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | — | ✓ |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | — | ✓ |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | — | ✓ |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | — | ✓ |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 2.3 L | 3.3 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 4 | inline 6 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | mild hybrid |
| Horsepower | 300 hp @ 5700 rpm | 280 hp @ 5000 rpm |
| Torque | 325 lb-ft @ 3400 rpm | 332 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 16 | 24 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | ✓ | ✓ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 7-speed manual | 8-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | four wheel drive | all wheel drive |
| 4WD System Type | Part Time | — |
| Transfer Case Gearing | Electronic Hi-Lo | — |
| Locking Hubs | Automatic | — |
| [object Object] | ✓ | — |
| [object Object] | ✓ | — |
| Hill Descent Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Center Differential Type | — | Limited Slip |
Fuel
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | premium unleaded (recommended) | regular unleaded |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 18/21 MPG | 24/28 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 19 MPG | 25 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 304.2/354.9 mi. | 444.0/518.0 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 16.9 gal. | 18.5 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control | ✓ | — |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single Zone Climate Control | ✓ | — |
| Interior Air Filtration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Transmission Controls on Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Front Parking Sensors | — | ✓ |
| Rear Parking Sensors | — | ✓ |
| Wireless Charging Pad | — | ✓ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | — | ✓ |
| Rear Door Pockets | — | ✓ |
| Front Seatback Storage | — | ✓ |
| Leather Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Heated Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts with Fan Control | — | ✓ |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | — | ✓ |
| Three Zone Climate Control | — | ✓ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 12.0 in | 12.3 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speaker System | 7 | 8 |
| Subwoofer Count | 1 | — |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio | ✓ | — |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | 3 months | — |
| Speed Sensitive Volume Control | — | ✓ |
Power Feature
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 2 | 4 |
| Remote Keyless Entry | ✓ | — |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Moonroof Type | — | 1st Row Power Glass |
| Keyless Entry | — | ✓ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 41.0 in. | 39.7 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 43.1 in. | 41.7 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 57.1 in. | 59.2 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 56.3 in. | 56.2 in. |
| Seat Material: Cloth | ✓ | — |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | 6-way | — |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 6-way | — |
| Passenger Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Seat Material: Leather | — | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Power Adjustments | — | 8-way |
| Driver Seat Lumbar Support | — | Power |
| Driver Seat Memory Settings | — | 2 |
| Passenger Seat Power Adjustments | — | 8-way |
| Driver Seat Heating | — | Multi-level |
| Passenger Seat Heating | — | Multi-level |
| Driver Seat Ventilation | — | ✓ |
| Passenger Seat Ventilation | — | ✓ |
Rearseats
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 39.8 in. | 39.3 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 35.7 in. | 39.4 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 51.8 in. | 58.1 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 43.3 in. | 55.5 in. |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reclining Rear Seats | — | ✓ |
| Folding Center Armrest | — | ✓ |
| Heated Rear Seats (Multi-Level) | — | ✓ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Finish | Painted Steel | Painted Alloy |
| Wheel Diameter | 16 in | — |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | 255/70R16 | 275/45R21 |
| Spare Tire Type | Full Size Matching | Temporary |
| Spare Tire Location | Outside Rear Mounted | Inside Mounted |
| Wheel Size | — | 21 x 9.5 in. |
Suspension
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Front Suspension Type | Independent | — |
| Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | — |
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | — | ✓ |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | — | ✓ |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | — | ✓ |
Warranty
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Ford Bronco and 2026 Mazda CX-70.
Is the 2025 Ford Bronco significantly less powerful than the 2026 Mazda CX-70?
No, the Bronco actually produces slightly more power with 300 hp compared to the CX-70’s 280 hp. However, the CX-70 nudges ahead slightly in torque with 332 lb-ft versus the Bronco's 325 lb-ft.
Which vehicle is better for long road trips regarding fuel stops?
The Mazda CX-70 is clearly better for long trips, achieving 25 MPG combined, while the Bronco will require stops more frequently due to its 19 MPG combined rating and recommendation for premium fuel.
Why is the Mazda CX-70 so much longer than the Ford Bronco?
The CX-70 measures 200.8 inches long, making it substantially longer than the Bronco’s 173.7 inches. This extra length directly contributes to the CX-70 offering significantly more usable interior and cargo room.
How does the driving experience differ between the two vehicles?
The Bronco offers a more rugged, traditional SUV feel with 4WD and a 7-speed manual transmission, suitable for adventure. The CX-70 is a longer crossover with AWD and an 8-speed automatic, designed for smoother, efficient pavement driving.
What is the exact price difference between the two base models?
The 2026 Mazda CX-70 has an MSRP of $42,250, making it $3,255 more expensive than the 2025 Ford Bronco, which starts at $38,995.
Are there notable differences in physical size that impact parking?
Yes, the Bronco is shorter in length (173.7 inches) and taller (71.9 inches), which might suit tighter parking garages better than the long, but lower, CX-70 (200.8 inches long, 68.2 inches high).
More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool