2025 Ford Bronco vs 2025 Toyota 4Runner
Comparison Overview
The most significant numerical difference between the 2025 models is the 22 horsepower gap, where the Ford Bronco delivers 300 hp compared to the Toyota 4Runner's 278 hp, accompanied by a slight edge in torque at 325 lb-ft versus 317 lb-ft. However, the 4Runner compensates with superior fuel economy, achieving a combined 22 MPG versus the Bronco's 19 MPG, which is a crucial factor given the Bronco recommends premium fuel while the 4Runner accepts regular unleaded. The 4Runner also offers substantially more utility, boasting 48.4 cu ft of cargo capacity, nearly doubling the Bronco's 20.6 cu ft. Conversely, the Bronco is listed with a lower MSRP of $38,995 compared to the 4Runner's $41,270. Furthermore, the Bronco features a 7-speed manual transmission option, contrasting with the 4Runner's 8-speed automatic.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2025 Toyota 4Runner
The 2025 Toyota 4Runner is the winner for commuters due to its superior combined fuel economy of 22 MPG and the use of regular unleaded gasoline.
2025 Toyota 4Runner
The 4Runner significantly outweighs the Bronco for families by offering 48.4 cu ft of cargo capacity versus only 20.6 cu ft.
2025 Ford Bronco
Enthusiasts favor the Bronco for its higher output of 300 hp and the availability of a specialized 7-speed manual transmission.
2025 Ford Bronco
The Ford Bronco offers better initial purchase value with an MSRP of $38,995, undercutting the 4Runner's $41,270 starting price.
Choose the Ford Bronco if...
- You prioritize drivetrain engagement and want the option of a 7-speed manual transmission.
- Your budget is tighter, as the Bronco has a lower MSRP of $38,995.
- You require maximum engine performance, as the Bronco leads with 300 hp and 325 lb-ft of torque.
Choose the Toyota 4Runner if...
- Maximizing cargo hauling is essential, given the 4Runner’s 48.4 cu ft capacity.
- You plan to drive longer distances and seek better efficiency, indicated by its 22 MPG combined rating.
- You wish to avoid the cost of premium fuel, as the 4Runner requires regular unleaded.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Ford Bronco | Toyota 4Runner |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 173.7" | 194.9" |
| Width | 75.9" | 78.0" |
| Height | 71.9" | 72.6" |
| Wheelbase | 100.4" | 112.2" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | ✓ | — |
| Brake Preparation System | ✓ | — |
| Brake Assist | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | ✓ | ✓ |
| LED Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Rear Headrests | 2 | 3 |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Blind Spot Monitor | — | ✓ |
| Lane Departure Warning | — | ✓ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | — | ✓ |
| Front Cross Traffic Alert | — | ✓ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | — | ✓ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | — | ✓ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | — | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes | — | ✓ |
| Front Fog Lights | — | ✓ |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | — | ✓ |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | — | ✓ |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 2.3 L | 2.4 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 4 | inline 4 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | gas |
| Horsepower | 300 hp @ 5700 rpm | 278 hp @ 6000 rpm |
| Torque | 325 lb-ft @ 3400 rpm | 317 lb-ft @ 1700 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 16 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | ✓ | ✓ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 7-speed manual | 8-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | four wheel drive | rear wheel drive |
| 4WD System Type | Part Time | — |
| Transfer Case Gearing | Electronic Hi-Lo | — |
| Locking Hubs | Automatic | — |
| [object Object] | ✓ | — |
| [object Object] | ✓ | — |
| Hill Descent Control | ✓ | — |
Fuel
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | premium unleaded (recommended) | regular unleaded |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 18/21 MPG | 20/26 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 19 MPG | 22 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 304.2/354.9 mi. | 380.0/494.0 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 16.9 gal. | 19.0 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control | ✓ | — |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single Zone Climate Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Interior Air Filtration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | — | ✓ |
| Rear Door Pockets | — | ✓ |
| Front Seatback Storage | — | ✓ |
| Leather Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Simulated Alloy Trim on Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | — | ✓ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 12.0 in | 8.0 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speaker System | 7 | 8 |
| Subwoofer Count | 1 | — |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | 3 months | 3 months |
Power Feature
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 2 | 4 |
| Remote Keyless Entry | ✓ | — |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Keyless Entry | — | ✓ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 41.0 in. | 39.7 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 43.1 in. | 41.8 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 57.1 in. | 58.0 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 56.3 in. | 55.2 in. |
| Seat Material: Cloth | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | 6-way | 6-way |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 6-way | 6-way |
| Passenger Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Lumbar Support | — | Power |
Rearseats
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 39.8 in. | 37.8 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 35.7 in. | 34.8 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 51.8 in. | 57.8 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 43.3 in. | 56.1 in. |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reclining Rear Seats | — | ✓ |
| Folding Center Armrest | — | ✓ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Finish | Painted Steel | Painted Alloy |
| Wheel Diameter | 16 in | 17 in |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | 255/70R16 | P245/70R17 |
| Spare Tire Type | Full Size Matching | — |
| Spare Tire Location | Outside Rear Mounted | — |
Suspension
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Front Suspension Type | Independent | — |
| Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | — |
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | — | ✓ |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | — | ✓ |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | — | ✓ |
Warranty
| Feature | Ford | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 2 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance | — | 2 yr./ 25000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Ford Bronco and 2025 Toyota 4Runner.
Which SUV has better fuel economy for daily driving?
The 2025 Toyota 4Runner is better equipped for daily driving efficiency, achieving a combined 22 MPG compared to the Bronco's 19 MPG. Furthermore, the 4Runner uses regular unleaded fuel, whereas the Bronco recommends premium.
How significant is the difference in power output between the two models?
The 2025 Ford Bronco offers 300 hp and 325 lb-ft of torque, slightly exceeding the 4Runner's 278 hp and 317 lb-ft of torque. This 22 hp advantage suggests the Bronco has marginally stronger acceleration capabilities based on engine specs alone.
Which vehicle provides more utility space for large items?
The Toyota 4Runner offers substantially more cargo volume at 48.4 cu ft. This nearly doubles the usable space available in the Ford Bronco, which is rated for 20.6 cu ft.
What is the impact of the difference in MSRP on overall cost?
The Ford Bronco starts at a lower price point ($38,995) than the Toyota 4Runner ($41,270), resulting in a $2,275 initial savings. This initial saving must be balanced against the 4Runner's superior projected fuel cost savings.
Are the transmissions comparable for off-road driving or spirited trips?
No, the transmissions target different drivers; the Bronco offers a manual 7-speed option, appealing to driving purists, while the 4Runner employs a modern 8-speed shiftable automatic for smoother on-road efficiency.
Do the physical dimensions affect garage fitment?
Yes, the Toyota 4Runner is significantly longer at 194.9 inches compared to the Bronco's 173.7 inches, which may influence parking in tighter garages, though both vehicles share similar overall heights near 72 inches.
More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool