2025 Ford Bronco vs 2025 Mazda CX-70
Comparison Overview
The 2025 Ford Bronco bursts onto the scene prioritizing raw, rugged capability with a standard 300 hp engine and a glorious 7-speed manual transmission, embodying authentic off-road spirit. Conversely, the 2025 Mazda CX-70 offers sophisticated on-road refinement, leveraging its 280 hp turbo engine paired with an efficient 8-speed automatic and achieving a commendable 25 MPG combined. The CX-70 boasts significant practicality with a massive 39.6 cu ft of cargo space compared to the Bronco's 20.6 cu ft. While the Bronco starts slightly cheaper at $38,995, it guzzles fuel, delivering only 19 MPG combined, whereas the Mazdaβs superior efficiency saves operational costs. The Bronco is significantly smaller and boxier (173.7 inches long), perfectly suited for tight trails, contrasting with the road-focused, longer CX-70.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2025 Mazda CX-70
The CX-70 wins for daily driving due to its significantly better 25 MPG combined fuel economy versus the Bronco's 19 MPG.
2025 Mazda CX-70
The Mazda CX-70 offers substantially more utility, boasting 39.6 cu ft of cargo capacity compared to the Bronco's 20.6 cu ft.
2025 Ford Bronco
The Bronco appeals directly to driving purists with its standard 300 hp and the highly engaging 7-speed manual transmission.
2025 Ford Bronco
The Ford Bronco offers a lower starting MSRP of $38,995 compared to the CX-70's $40,445, despite having higher horsepower.
Choose the Ford Bronco if...
- You crave the ultimate driver engagement provided by the standard 7-speed manual transmission.
- Your adventures require true 4WD capability and a tougher stance (71.9 inches high).
- You want the highest base horsepower available at 300 hp for tackling terrain.
Choose the Mazda CX-70 if...
- Fuel economy is paramount; the CX-70 delivers 28 MPG highway versus the Bronco's 21 MPG highway.
- You need maximum hauling capability, benefiting from 39.6 cu ft of cargo volume.
- You prefer smoother, automated driving characterized by the 8-speed shiftable automatic transmission.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Ford Bronco | Mazda CX-70 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 173.7" | 200.8" |
| Width | 75.9" | - |
| Height | 71.9" | 68.2" |
| Wheelbase | 100.4" | 122.8" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-Collision Safety System | β | β |
| Post-Collision Safety System | β | β |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | β | β |
| Front Head Airbags | β | β |
| Rear Head Airbags | β | β |
| Electronic Stability Control | β | β |
| Traction Control System | β | β |
| LATCH System | β | β |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | β | β |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | β | β |
| Brake Preparation System | β | β |
| Brake Assist | β | β |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | β | β |
| Automatic Headlights | β | β |
| Headlight Delay-Off | β | β |
| LED Headlights | β | β |
| Daytime Running Lights | β | β |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Rear Headrests | 2 | 3 |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | β | β |
| Blind Spot Monitor | β | β |
| Lane Departure Warning | β | β |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | β | β |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | β | β |
| Driver Attention Alert | β | β |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | β | β |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | β | β |
| Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes | β | β |
| Self-Leveling Headlights | β | β |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | β | β |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | β | β |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | β | β |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | β | β |
| Engine Immobilizer | β | β |
Engine
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 2.3 L | 3.3 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 4 | inline 6 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | mild hybrid |
| Horsepower | 300 hp @ 5700 rpm | 280 hp @ 5000 rpm |
| Torque | 325 lb-ft @ 3400 rpm | 332 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 16 | 24 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | β | β |
Drive Train
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 7-speed manual | 8-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | four wheel drive | all wheel drive |
| 4WD System Type | Part Time | β |
| Transfer Case Gearing | Electronic Hi-Lo | β |
| Locking Hubs | Automatic | β |
| [object Object] | β | β |
| [object Object] | β | β |
| Hill Descent Control | β | β |
| Center Differential Type | β | Limited Slip |
Fuel
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | premium unleaded (recommended) | regular unleaded |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 18/21 MPG | 24/28 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 19 MPG | 25 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 304.2/354.9 mi. | 444.0/518.0 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 16.9 gal. | 18.5 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | β | β |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | β | β |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | β | β |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | β | β |
| Electric Power Steering | β | β |
| Rear View Camera | β | β |
| Cruise Control | β | β |
| Front Cupholders | β | β |
| Rear Cupholders | β | β |
| Front Door Pockets | β | β |
| Overhead Console with Storage | β | β |
| Single Zone Climate Control | β | β |
| Interior Air Filtration | β | β |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | β | β |
| Transmission Controls on Steering Wheel | β | β |
| Front Parking Sensors | β | β |
| Rear Parking Sensors | β | β |
| Wireless Charging Pad | β | β |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | β | β |
| Rear Door Pockets | β | β |
| Front Seatback Storage | β | β |
| Leather Steering Wheel | β | β |
| Three Zone Climate Control | β | β |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | β | β |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | β | β |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 12.0 in | 12.3 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | β | β |
| Speaker System | 7 | 8 |
| Subwoofer Count | 1 | β |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | β | β |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | β | β |
| USB Port | β | β |
| USB Port with External Media Control | β | β |
| Satellite Radio | β | β |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | 3 months | β |
| Speed Sensitive Volume Control | β | β |
Power Feature
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 2 | 4 |
| Remote Keyless Entry | β | β |
| Heated Mirrors | β | β |
| Moonroof Type | β | 1st Row Power Glass |
| Keyless Entry | β | β |
Frontseats
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 41.0 in. | 39.7 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 43.1 in. | 41.7 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 57.1 in. | 59.2 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 56.3 in. | 56.2 in. |
| Seat Material: Cloth | β | β |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | β | β |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | 6-way | β |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | β | β |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 6-way | β |
| Passenger Seat Height Adjustment | β | β |
| Seat Material: Leather | β | β |
| Driver Seat Power Adjustments | β | 8-way |
| Driver Seat Lumbar Support | β | Power |
| Passenger Seat Power Adjustments | β | 4-way |
| Driver Seat Heating | β | Multi-level |
| Passenger Seat Heating | β | Multi-level |
Rearseats
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 39.8 in. | 39.3 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 35.7 in. | 39.4 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 51.8 in. | 58.1 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 43.3 in. | 55.5 in. |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | β | β |
| Reclining Rear Seats | β | β |
| Folding Center Armrest | β | β |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Finish | Painted Steel | β |
| Wheel Diameter | 16 in | β |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | 255/70R16 | 265/55R19 |
| Spare Tire Type | Full Size Matching | Temporary |
| Spare Tire Location | Outside Rear Mounted | Inside Mounted |
| Wheel Material | β | Alloy |
| Wheel Size | β | 19 x 8.5 in |
Suspension
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Front Suspension Type | Independent | β |
| Stabilizer Bar | β | β |
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | β | β |
Warranty
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Ford Bronco and 2025 Mazda CX-70.
Which vehicle offers better real-world fuel savings?
The Mazda CX-70 is the clear winner for fuel savings, achieving 25 MPG combined using regular unleaded gasoline. The Bronco's 19 MPG combined rating and recommendation for premium fuel will result in significantly higher running costs.
Is the Broncoβs manual transmission standard on all models?
Yes, for the 2025 model year compared here, the Bronco comes equipped with the thrilling 7-speed manual transmission straight out of the box. The CX-70 comes exclusively with an 8-speed automatic.
How much larger is the CX-70βs cargo area than the Broncoβs?
The CX-70 provides substantially more space for gear, offering 39.6 cu ft of cargo capacity. The smaller, boxier Bronco manages only 20.6 cu ft, making the Mazda better suited for family trips requiring lots of luggage.
Which vehicle has more low-end pulling power (torque)?
The Mazda CX-70 edges out the competition in low-end grunt, producing 332 lb-ft of torque compared to the Bronco's 325 lb-ft. This should translate to strong pulling capability when accelerating on the highway.
How do their physical sizes compare for parking and maneuvering?
The Ford Bronco is much more compact, measuring 173.7 inches long and 75.9 inches wide, which is advantageous in tight city parking. The CX-70 is significantly longer at 200.8 inches, making it handle more like a traditional large SUV on tight streets.
Is the base price difference meaningful considering the features?
The Bronco starts $1,450 cheaper at $38,995, offering higher base horsepower (300 hp vs 280 hp). However, this price gap narrows quickly when considering the CX-70's superior efficiency and larger interior volume.
More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool