2025 Ford Bronco vs 2025 Mazda CX-70

Ford Bronco

$38,995 Β· SUV

vs
Mazda CX-70

$40,445 Β· Crossover

Comparison Overview

The 2025 Ford Bronco bursts onto the scene prioritizing raw, rugged capability with a standard 300 hp engine and a glorious 7-speed manual transmission, embodying authentic off-road spirit. Conversely, the 2025 Mazda CX-70 offers sophisticated on-road refinement, leveraging its 280 hp turbo engine paired with an efficient 8-speed automatic and achieving a commendable 25 MPG combined. The CX-70 boasts significant practicality with a massive 39.6 cu ft of cargo space compared to the Bronco's 20.6 cu ft. While the Bronco starts slightly cheaper at $38,995, it guzzles fuel, delivering only 19 MPG combined, whereas the Mazda’s superior efficiency saves operational costs. The Bronco is significantly smaller and boxier (173.7 inches long), perfectly suited for tight trails, contrasting with the road-focused, longer CX-70.

Size Comparison

Performance

Fuel Efficiency

Full Specifications

Our Verdicts

πŸš— Best for Commuters

2025 Mazda CX-70

The CX-70 wins for daily driving due to its significantly better 25 MPG combined fuel economy versus the Bronco's 19 MPG.

πŸ‘¨β€πŸ‘©β€πŸ‘§β€πŸ‘¦ Best for Families

2025 Mazda CX-70

The Mazda CX-70 offers substantially more utility, boasting 39.6 cu ft of cargo capacity compared to the Bronco's 20.6 cu ft.

🏎️ Best for Enthusiasts

2025 Ford Bronco

The Bronco appeals directly to driving purists with its standard 300 hp and the highly engaging 7-speed manual transmission.

πŸ’° Best Value

2025 Ford Bronco

The Ford Bronco offers a lower starting MSRP of $38,995 compared to the CX-70's $40,445, despite having higher horsepower.

Choose the Ford Bronco if...

  • You crave the ultimate driver engagement provided by the standard 7-speed manual transmission.
  • Your adventures require true 4WD capability and a tougher stance (71.9 inches high).
  • You want the highest base horsepower available at 300 hp for tackling terrain.

Choose the Mazda CX-70 if...

  • Fuel economy is paramount; the CX-70 delivers 28 MPG highway versus the Bronco's 21 MPG highway.
  • You need maximum hauling capability, benefiting from 39.6 cu ft of cargo volume.
  • You prefer smoother, automated driving characterized by the 8-speed shiftable automatic transmission.

Key Dimensions

Dimension Ford Bronco Mazda CX-70
Length 173.7" 200.8"
Width 75.9" -
Height 71.9" 68.2"
Wheelbase 100.4" 122.8"

Features Comparison

Safety
Feature Ford Mazda
Pre-Collision Safety System βœ“ βœ“
Post-Collision Safety System βœ“ βœ“
Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags βœ“ βœ“
Front Head Airbags βœ“ βœ“
Rear Head Airbags βœ“ βœ“
Electronic Stability Control βœ“ βœ“
Traction Control System βœ“ βœ“
LATCH System βœ“ βœ“
Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) 4-Wheel 4-Wheel
Front Ventilated Disc Brakes βœ“ βœ“
Rear Solid Disc Brakes βœ“ β€”
Brake Preparation System βœ“ β€”
Brake Assist βœ“ β€”
Tire Pressure Monitoring System βœ“ βœ“
Automatic Headlights βœ“ βœ“
Headlight Delay-Off βœ“ βœ“
LED Headlights βœ“ βœ“
Daytime Running Lights βœ“ βœ“
Front Headrests 2 2
Rear Headrests 2 3
Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) βœ“ β€”
Blind Spot Monitor β€” βœ“
Lane Departure Warning β€” βœ“
Lane Keeping Assist System β€” βœ“
Rear Cross Traffic Alert β€” βœ“
Driver Attention Alert β€” βœ“
Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation β€” βœ“
Rear Door Child Safety Locks β€” βœ“
Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes β€” βœ“
Self-Leveling Headlights β€” βœ“
Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors β€” βœ“
Front Height Adjustable Headrests β€” βœ“
Rear Height Adjustable Headrests β€” βœ“
Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt β€” βœ“
Engine Immobilizer β€” βœ“
Engine
Feature Ford Mazda
Base Engine Displacement 2.3 L 3.3 L
Number of Cylinders inline 4 inline 6
Base Engine Type gas mild hybrid
Horsepower 300 hp @ 5700 rpm 280 hp @ 5000 rpm
Torque 325 lb-ft @ 3400 rpm 332 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm
Number of Valves 16 24
Camshaft Type Double overhead cam (DOHC) Double overhead cam (DOHC)
Variable Valve Timing Variable Variable
Fuel Injection Type βœ“ βœ“
Drive Train
Feature Ford Mazda
Transmission Type 7-speed manual 8-speed shiftable automatic
Drivetrain Type four wheel drive all wheel drive
4WD System Type Part Time β€”
Transfer Case Gearing Electronic Hi-Lo β€”
Locking Hubs Automatic β€”
[object Object] βœ“ β€”
[object Object] βœ“ β€”
Hill Descent Control βœ“ βœ“
Center Differential Type β€” Limited Slip
Fuel
Feature Ford Mazda
Fuel Type premium unleaded (recommended) regular unleaded
EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) 18/21 MPG 24/28 MPG
EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) 19 MPG 25 MPG
EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) 304.2/354.9 mi. 444.0/518.0 mi.
Fuel Tank Capacity 16.9 gal. 18.5 gal.
Comfort & Convenience
Feature Ford Mazda
Push Button Start βœ“ βœ“
Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel βœ“ βœ“
Audio Controls on Steering Wheel βœ“ βœ“
Cruise Control on Steering Wheel βœ“ βœ“
Electric Power Steering βœ“ βœ“
Rear View Camera βœ“ βœ“
Cruise Control βœ“ β€”
Front Cupholders βœ“ βœ“
Rear Cupholders βœ“ βœ“
Front Door Pockets βœ“ βœ“
Overhead Console with Storage βœ“ βœ“
Single Zone Climate Control βœ“ β€”
Interior Air Filtration βœ“ β€”
Dual Vanity Mirrors βœ“ βœ“
Transmission Controls on Steering Wheel β€” βœ“
Front Parking Sensors β€” βœ“
Rear Parking Sensors β€” βœ“
Wireless Charging Pad β€” βœ“
Adaptive Cruise Control β€” βœ“
Rear Door Pockets β€” βœ“
Front Seatback Storage β€” βœ“
Leather Steering Wheel β€” βœ“
Three Zone Climate Control β€” βœ“
Rear Ventilation Ducts β€” βœ“
Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors β€” βœ“
In Car Entertainment
Feature Ford Mazda
Infotainment Display 12.0 in 12.3 in
AM/FM Stereo βœ“ βœ“
Speaker System 7 8
Subwoofer Count 1 β€”
Android Auto (Wireless) βœ“ βœ“
Apple CarPlay (Wireless) βœ“ βœ“
USB Port βœ“ βœ“
USB Port with External Media Control βœ“ βœ“
Satellite Radio βœ“ β€”
Satellite Radio Trial Period 3 months β€”
Speed Sensitive Volume Control β€” βœ“
Power Feature
Feature Ford Mazda
One-Touch Power Windows 2 4
Remote Keyless Entry βœ“ β€”
Heated Mirrors βœ“ βœ“
Moonroof Type β€” 1st Row Power Glass
Keyless Entry β€” βœ“
Frontseats
Feature Ford Mazda
Front Head Room 41.0 in. 39.7 in.
Front Leg Room 43.1 in. 41.7 in.
Front Shoulder Room 57.1 in. 59.2 in.
Front Hip Room 56.3 in. 56.2 in.
Seat Material: Cloth βœ“ β€”
Front Seat Type: Bucket βœ“ βœ“
Driver Seat Manual Adjustments 6-way β€”
Driver Seat Height Adjustment βœ“ βœ“
Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments 6-way β€”
Passenger Seat Height Adjustment βœ“ β€”
Seat Material: Leather β€” βœ“
Driver Seat Power Adjustments β€” 8-way
Driver Seat Lumbar Support β€” Power
Passenger Seat Power Adjustments β€” 4-way
Driver Seat Heating β€” Multi-level
Passenger Seat Heating β€” Multi-level
Rearseats
Feature Ford Mazda
Rear Head Room 39.8 in. 39.3 in.
Rear Leg Room 35.7 in. 39.4 in.
Rear Shoulder Room 51.8 in. 58.1 in.
Rear Hip Room 43.3 in. 55.5 in.
Split-Folding Rear Seatback βœ“ βœ“
Reclining Rear Seats β€” βœ“
Folding Center Armrest β€” βœ“
Tires and Wheels
Feature Ford Mazda
Wheel Finish Painted Steel β€”
Wheel Diameter 16 in β€”
Tire Type All Season All Season
Tire Size 255/70R16 265/55R19
Spare Tire Type Full Size Matching Temporary
Spare Tire Location Outside Rear Mounted Inside Mounted
Wheel Material β€” Alloy
Wheel Size β€” 19 x 8.5 in
Suspension
Feature Ford Mazda
Front Suspension Type Independent β€”
Stabilizer Bar βœ“ βœ“
Four-Wheel Independent Suspension β€” βœ“
Warranty
Feature Ford Mazda
Basic Warranty 3 yr./ 36000 mi. 3 yr./ 36000 mi.
Drivetrain Warranty 5 yr./ 60000 mi. 5 yr./ 60000 mi.
Corrosion/Rust Warranty 5 yr./ unlimited mi. 5 yr./ unlimited mi.
Roadside Assistance 5 yr./ 60000 mi. 3 yr./ 36000 mi.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about comparing the 2025 Ford Bronco and 2025 Mazda CX-70.

Which vehicle offers better real-world fuel savings?

The Mazda CX-70 is the clear winner for fuel savings, achieving 25 MPG combined using regular unleaded gasoline. The Bronco's 19 MPG combined rating and recommendation for premium fuel will result in significantly higher running costs.

Is the Bronco’s manual transmission standard on all models?

Yes, for the 2025 model year compared here, the Bronco comes equipped with the thrilling 7-speed manual transmission straight out of the box. The CX-70 comes exclusively with an 8-speed automatic.

How much larger is the CX-70’s cargo area than the Bronco’s?

The CX-70 provides substantially more space for gear, offering 39.6 cu ft of cargo capacity. The smaller, boxier Bronco manages only 20.6 cu ft, making the Mazda better suited for family trips requiring lots of luggage.

Which vehicle has more low-end pulling power (torque)?

The Mazda CX-70 edges out the competition in low-end grunt, producing 332 lb-ft of torque compared to the Bronco's 325 lb-ft. This should translate to strong pulling capability when accelerating on the highway.

How do their physical sizes compare for parking and maneuvering?

The Ford Bronco is much more compact, measuring 173.7 inches long and 75.9 inches wide, which is advantageous in tight city parking. The CX-70 is significantly longer at 200.8 inches, making it handle more like a traditional large SUV on tight streets.

Is the base price difference meaningful considering the features?

The Bronco starts $1,450 cheaper at $38,995, offering higher base horsepower (300 hp vs 280 hp). However, this price gap narrows quickly when considering the CX-70's superior efficiency and larger interior volume.

More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)

View all

Vehicle Details

Compare More Vehicles

Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once

Open Comparison Tool