2025 Ford Bronco vs 2025 Mazda CX-50

$38,995 · SUV

$30,500 · Crossover

Comparison Overview

The most significant numerical divergence between the 2025 Ford Bronco and the 2025 Mazda CX-50 is the MSRP, with the Bronco starting at $38,995 compared to the CX-50's $30,500, a difference of $8,495. Power output shows a stark contrast, as the Bronco delivers 300 hp and 325 lb-ft of torque, significantly outpacing the CX-50's 187 hp and 185 lb-ft. Fuel economy heavily favors the Mazda, achieving 28 combined MPG on regular unleaded versus the Bronco's 19 combined MPG, which requires premium fuel. Functionally, the CX-50 offers superior utility with 31.4 cu ft of cargo capacity compared to the Bronco's 20.6 cu ft. However, the Bronco's off-road architecture is reflected in its 71.9-inch height versus the CX-50's 63.5 inches, suggesting differing design intents between the rugged SUV and the refined crossover.

Size Comparison

Performance

Fuel Efficiency

Full Specifications

Our Verdicts

🚗 Best for Commuters

2025 Mazda CX-50

The Mazda CX-50 is the clear commuter winner due to its 28 combined MPG efficiency and lower running costs associated with regular unleaded fuel.

👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Best for Families

2025 Mazda CX-50

The CX-50 provides substantially more usable space, boasting 31.4 cu ft of cargo capacity against the Bronco's 20.6 cu ft.

🏎️ Best for Enthusiasts

2025 Ford Bronco

The Ford Bronco appeals to driving enthusiasts with its high output of 300 hp and torque-rich 325 lb-ft, coupled with a specialized 7-speed manual transmission.

💰 Best Value

2025 Mazda CX-50

The Mazda CX-50 offers a lower barrier to entry at $30,500 MSRP while providing better efficiency and greater cargo volume.

Choose the Ford Bronco if...

You prioritize maximum engine performance, benefiting from 300 hp and 325 lb-ft of torque.
A dedicated four-wheel drive system and a 7-speed manual transmission are mandatory for your driving style.
You require the taller, narrower profile (71.9 inches high) associated with a body-on-frame SUV design.

Choose the Mazda CX-50 if...

Fuel economy is critical, leveraging the 28 combined MPG versus the Bronco's 19 MPG.
You need superior cargo capacity, as the CX-50 offers 31.4 cu ft compared to 20.6 cu ft.
A lower initial investment is preferred, given the $30,500 MSRP compared to the Bronco's $38,995.

Key Dimensions

Dimension	Ford Bronco	Mazda CX-50
Length	173.7"	185.8"
Width	75.9"	75.6"
Height	71.9"	63.5"
Wheelbase	100.4"	110.8"

Features Comparison

Safety

Feature	Ford	Mazda
Pre-Collision Safety System	✓	✓
Post-Collision Safety System	✓	✓
Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags	✓	✓
Front Head Airbags	✓	✓
Rear Head Airbags	✓	✓
Electronic Stability Control	✓	✓
Traction Control System	✓	✓
LATCH System	✓	✓
Anti-lock Brakes (ABS)	4-Wheel	4-Wheel
Front Ventilated Disc Brakes	✓	✓
Rear Solid Disc Brakes	✓	✓
Brake Preparation System	✓	—
Brake Assist	✓	✓
Tire Pressure Monitoring System	✓	✓
Automatic Headlights	✓	✓
Headlight Delay-Off	✓	✓
LED Headlights	✓	✓
Daytime Running Lights	✓	✓
Front Headrests	2	2
Rear Headrests	2	3
Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote)	✓	—
Blind Spot Monitor	—	✓
Lane Departure Warning	—	✓
Lane Keeping Assist System	—	✓
Rear Cross Traffic Alert	—	✓
Driver Attention Alert	—	✓
Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation	—	✓
Rear Door Child Safety Locks	—	✓
Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors	—	✓
Front Height Adjustable Headrests	—	✓
Rear Height Adjustable Headrests	—	✓
Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt	—	✓
Engine Immobilizer	—	✓

Engine

Feature	Ford	Mazda
Base Engine Displacement	2.3 L	2.5 L
Number of Cylinders	inline 4	inline 4
Base Engine Type	gas	gas
Horsepower	300 hp @ 5700 rpm	187 hp @ 6000 rpm
Torque	325 lb-ft @ 3400 rpm	185 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm
Number of Valves	16	16
Camshaft Type	Double overhead cam (DOHC)	Double overhead cam (DOHC)
Variable Valve Timing	Variable	Variable
Fuel Injection Type	✓	✓
Cylinder Deactivation	—	✓

Drive Train

Feature	Ford	Mazda
Transmission Type	7-speed manual	6-speed shiftable automatic
Drivetrain Type	four wheel drive	all wheel drive
4WD System Type	Part Time	—
Transfer Case Gearing	Electronic Hi-Lo	—
Locking Hubs	Automatic	—
[object Object]	✓	—
[object Object]	✓	—
Hill Descent Control	✓	—

Fuel

Feature	Ford	Mazda
Fuel Type	premium unleaded (recommended)	regular unleaded
EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway)	18/21 MPG	25/31 MPG
EPA Fuel Economy (Combined)	19 MPG	28 MPG
EPA Driving Range (City/Highway)	304.2/354.9 mi.	397.5/492.9 mi.
Fuel Tank Capacity	16.9 gal.	15.9 gal.

Comfort & Convenience

Feature	Ford	Mazda
Push Button Start	✓	✓
Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel	✓	✓
Audio Controls on Steering Wheel	✓	✓
Cruise Control on Steering Wheel	✓	✓
Electric Power Steering	✓	✓
Rear View Camera	✓	✓
Cruise Control	✓	—
Front Cupholders	✓	✓
Rear Cupholders	✓	✓
Front Door Pockets	✓	✓
Overhead Console with Storage	✓	✓
Single Zone Climate Control	✓	—
Interior Air Filtration	✓	✓
Dual Vanity Mirrors	✓	✓
Adaptive Cruise Control	—	✓
Rear Door Pockets	—	✓
Front Seatback Storage	—	✓
Leather Steering Wheel	—	✓
Dual Zone Climate Control	—	✓
Rear Ventilation Ducts	—	✓
Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors	—	✓

In Car Entertainment

Feature	Ford	Mazda
Infotainment Display	12.0 in	10.3 in
AM/FM Stereo	✓	✓
Speaker System	7	8
Subwoofer Count	1	—
Android Auto (Wireless)	✓	✓
Apple CarPlay (Wireless)	✓	✓
USB Port	✓	✓
USB Port with External Media Control	✓	✓
Satellite Radio	✓	—
Satellite Radio Trial Period	3 months	—

Power Feature

Feature	Ford	Mazda
One-Touch Power Windows	2	4
Remote Keyless Entry	✓	—
Heated Mirrors	✓	✓
Keyless Entry	—	✓

Frontseats

Feature	Ford	Mazda
Front Head Room	41.0 in.	39.1 in.
Front Leg Room	43.1 in.	41.7 in.
Front Shoulder Room	57.1 in.	55.9 in.
Front Hip Room	56.3 in.	53.6 in.
Seat Material: Cloth	✓	—
Front Seat Type: Bucket	✓	✓
Driver Seat Manual Adjustments	6-way	6-way
Driver Seat Height Adjustment	✓	✓
Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments	6-way	4-way
Passenger Seat Height Adjustment	✓	—
Seat Material: Leatherette	—	✓

Rearseats

Feature	Ford	Mazda
Rear Head Room	39.8 in.	38.6 in.
Rear Leg Room	35.7 in.	39.8 in.
Rear Shoulder Room	51.8 in.	53.6 in.
Rear Hip Room	43.3 in.	52.1 in.
Split-Folding Rear Seatback	✓	✓
Folding Center Armrest	—	✓

Tires and Wheels

Feature	Ford	Mazda
Wheel Finish	Painted Steel	Painted Alloy
Wheel Diameter	16 in	—
Tire Type	All Season	All Season
Tire Size	255/70R16	P225/65R17
Spare Tire Type	Full Size Matching	Temporary
Spare Tire Location	Outside Rear Mounted	Inside Mounted
Wheel Size	—	17 x 7.0 in

Suspension

Feature	Ford	Mazda
Front Suspension Type	Independent	Independent
Stabilizer Bar	✓	✓

Warranty

Feature	Ford	Mazda
Basic Warranty	3 yr./ 36000 mi.	3 yr./ 36000 mi.
Drivetrain Warranty	5 yr./ 60000 mi.	5 yr./ 60000 mi.
Corrosion/Rust Warranty	5 yr./ unlimited mi.	5 yr./ unlimited mi.
Roadside Assistance	5 yr./ 60000 mi.	3 yr./ 36000 mi.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about comparing the 2025 Ford Bronco and 2025 Mazda CX-50.

How significant is the fuel economy difference between the Bronco and the CX-50?

The difference is substantial, with the Mazda CX-50 achieving 28 combined MPG while the Ford Bronco manages only 19 combined MPG. Furthermore, the CX-50 runs on less expensive regular unleaded, while the Bronco recommends premium fuel.

Which vehicle provides more practical interior storage?

The Mazda CX-50 is the superior choice for storage, offering 31.4 cubic feet of cargo capacity. This significantly surpasses the 20.6 cubic feet available in the more rugged Ford Bronco.

What does the transmission difference mean for performance driving?

The enthusiast-oriented Bronco features a 7-speed manual transmission for greater driver engagement, whereas the CX-50 uses a 6-speed shiftable automatic that prioritizes automated convenience.

Is the power gap between these two vehicles large?

Yes, the power gap is considerable; the Bronco produces 300 hp and 325 lb-ft of torque, resulting in 113 more horsepower than the CX-50's 187 hp rating.

Why is the Bronco's MSRP nearly $8,500 higher than the CX-50?

The higher MSRP for the Bronco reflects its specialized capabilities, including its dedicated four-wheel drive system, more powerful engine configuration, and SUV body style compared to the CX-50 crossover architecture.

How do the exterior dimensions differ between the two models?

The CX-50 is longer at 185.8 inches versus the Bronco's 173.7 inches, but the Bronco is notably taller at 71.9 inches, emphasizing ground clearance over overall length.