2025 Ford Bronco vs 2025 Kia Niro Plug-In Hybrid
Comparison Overview
The most significant numerical disparity between the 2025 Ford Bronco and the 2025 Kia Niro Plug-In Hybrid lies in fuel economy, with the Niro achieving 48 combined MPG compared to the Bronco's 19 combined MPG, a 29 MPG advantage. Performance metrics heavily favor the Bronco, which produces 300 hp and 325 lb-ft of torque, dwarfing the Niro's 180 hp and 195 lb-ft of torque. This power difference is notable considering the Bronco has a higher MSRP of $38,995 versus the Niro's $34,490. Dimensionally, the vehicles are close in length (174.0 inches for the Niro vs. 173.7 inches for the Bronco), but the Bronco stands significantly taller at 71.9 inches, contrasting with the Niro's 60.8 inches. The Bronco also offers slightly more cargo space at 20.6 cu ft over the Niro's 19.4 cu ft, though the Niro adds a 33-mile electric range.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2025 Kia Niro Plug-In Hybrid
The 2025 Kia Niro Plug-In Hybrid clearly wins for commuters due to its 48 combined MPG rating and 33 miles of all-electric capability.
2025 Ford Bronco
The 2025 Ford Bronco offers superior physical utility with its 71.9-inch height and 20.6 cu ft of cargo capacity, better suited for varied family activities.
2025 Ford Bronco
The 300 hp and 325 lb-ft of torque paired with a four-wheel drive and 7-speed manual transmission makes the Bronco the definitive choice for driving enthusiasts.
2025 Kia Niro Plug-In Hybrid
Despite being $4,505 cheaper, the Niro provides dramatically better long-term running costs through its efficiency, offsetting the higher upfront cost of the Bronco.
Choose the Ford Bronco if...
- Your priority is maximum mechanical capability, indicated by its 300 hp and standard four-wheel drive.
- You specifically desire a 7-speed manual transmission coupled with 325 lb-ft of torque.
- You require maximum vertical clearance, as the Bronco stands 71.9 inches high compared to the Niro's 60.8 inches.
Choose the Kia Niro Plug-In Hybrid if...
- Fuel economy is paramount, evidenced by its superior 48 combined MPG versus the Bronco's 19 MPG.
- You prioritize lower operational expenses, as it uses regular unleaded fuel and offers a 33-mile electric range.
- A lower initial investment is necessary, with an MSRP of $34,490 compared to the Bronco's $38,995.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Ford Bronco | Kia Niro Plug-In Hybrid |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 173.7" | 174.0" |
| Width | 75.9" | 71.8" |
| Height | 71.9" | 60.8" |
| Wheelbase | 100.4" | 107.1" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Ford | Kia |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Brake Preparation System | ✓ | — |
| Brake Assist | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | ✓ | ✓ |
| LED Headlights | ✓ | — |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Rear Headrests | 2 | 3 |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Blind Spot Monitor | — | ✓ |
| Lane Departure Warning | — | ✓ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | — | ✓ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | — | ✓ |
| Driver Attention Alert | — | ✓ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | — | ✓ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | — | ✓ |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | — | ✓ |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | — | ✓ |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | — | ✓ |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | — | ✓ |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Ford | Kia |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 2.3 L | 1.6 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 4 | inline 4 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | plug-in hybrid |
| Horsepower | 300 hp @ 5700 rpm | 180 hp |
| Torque | 325 lb-ft @ 3400 rpm | 195 lb-ft |
| Number of Valves | 16 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | ✓ | ✓ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Ford | Kia |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 7-speed manual | 6-speed automated manual |
| Drivetrain Type | four wheel drive | front wheel drive |
| 4WD System Type | Part Time | — |
| Transfer Case Gearing | Electronic Hi-Lo | — |
| Locking Hubs | Automatic | — |
| [object Object] | ✓ | — |
| [object Object] | ✓ | — |
| Hill Descent Control | ✓ | ✓ |
Fuel
| Feature | Ford | Kia |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | premium unleaded (recommended) | regular unleaded |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 18/21 MPG | 49/47 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 19 MPG | 48 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 304.2/354.9 mi. | 480.2/460.6 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 16.9 gal. | 9.8 gal. |
| EPA Efficiency (City/Highway MPGe) | — | 113/102 MPGe |
| EPA Efficiency (Combined MPGe) | — | 108 MPGe |
| EPA Electric Driving Range | — | 33 mi. |
| EPA Energy Consumption (kWh/100 mi) | — | 31 |
| Charging Time (240V) | — | 2.8 hr. |
| DC Fast Charging Port Type | — | SAE J1772 |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Ford | Kia |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control | ✓ | — |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | ✓ | — |
| Single Zone Climate Control | ✓ | — |
| Interior Air Filtration | ✓ | — |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Transmission Controls on Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Rear Parking Sensors | — | ✓ |
| Wireless Charging Pad | — | ✓ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | — | ✓ |
| Rear Door Pockets | — | ✓ |
| Front Seatback Storage | — | ✓ |
| Leatherette Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Dual Zone Climate Control | — | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | — | ✓ |
| Extended Cabin Heating/Cooling | — | ✓ |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | — | ✓ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Ford | Kia |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 12.0 in | 10.3 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speaker System | 7 | 6 |
| Subwoofer Count | 1 | 1 |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | ✓ | — |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | ✓ | — |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio | ✓ | With Real Time Traffic |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | 3 months | 3 months |
| Android Auto (Wired) | — | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wired) | — | ✓ |
Power Feature
| Feature | Ford | Kia |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 2 | 1 |
| Remote Keyless Entry | ✓ | — |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Keyless Entry | — | ✓ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Ford | Kia |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 41.0 in. | 40.5 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 43.1 in. | 41.5 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 57.1 in. | 56.2 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 56.3 in. | 53.3 in. |
| Seat Material: Cloth | ✓ | — |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | 6-way | — |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 6-way | 6-way |
| Passenger Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Seat Material: Leatherette/Cloth | — | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Power Adjustments | — | 8-way |
| Driver Seat Lumbar Support | — | Power |
| Driver Seat Heating | — | Multi-level |
| Passenger Seat Heating | — | Multi-level |
Rearseats
| Feature | Ford | Kia |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 39.8 in. | 39.5 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 35.7 in. | 39.8 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 51.8 in. | 55.4 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 43.3 in. | 53.0 in. |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | ✓ | ✓ |
| Folding Center Armrest | — | ✓ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Ford | Kia |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Finish | Painted Steel | Painted Alloy |
| Wheel Diameter | 16 in | — |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | 255/70R16 | P205/60R H |
| Spare Tire Type | Full Size Matching | — |
| Spare Tire Location | Outside Rear Mounted | — |
| Wheel Size | — | 16 x 6.5 in |
Suspension
| Feature | Ford | Kia |
|---|---|---|
| Front Suspension Type | Independent | — |
| Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | ✓ |
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | — | ✓ |
Warranty
| Feature | Ford | Kia |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 10 yr./ 100000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 5 yr./ 100000 mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| EV Battery Warranty | — | 10 yr./ 100000 mi. |
| Hybrid Component Warranty | — | 10 yr./ 100000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Ford Bronco and 2025 Kia Niro Plug-In Hybrid.
How much more expensive is the 2025 Ford Bronco compared to the Kia Niro PHEV?
The 2025 Ford Bronco has a starting MSRP of $38,995, which is exactly $4,505 more than the 2025 Kia Niro Plug-In Hybrid's starting price of $34,490.
Which vehicle offers better power output for acceleration?
The Ford Bronco delivers significantly higher power with 300 hp and 325 lb-ft of torque, compared to the Niro's 180 hp and 195 lb-ft of torque.
Can the Kia Niro fully replace gasoline use for daily driving?
The Kia Niro PHEV has an official electric range of 33 miles, meaning shorter commutes under that distance can potentially be completed using only battery power.
What is the difference in cargo volume between these two utility vehicles?
The Bronco provides a slightly larger primary cargo area at 20.6 cubic feet, while the Niro offers 19.4 cubic feet.
Which vehicle is recommended for minimizing yearly fuel expenses?
The Niro is the clear winner for low running costs, boasting 48 combined MPG and the ability to use regular unleaded fuel, contrasting sharply with the Bronco's 19 combined MPG rating.
Are there significant differences in drivetrain and transmission type?
Yes, the Bronco features a robust four-wheel drive system mated to a 7-speed manual transmission, whereas the Niro utilizes front-wheel drive with a 6-speed automated manual.
More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool