2025 Ford Bronco Sport vs 2026 Honda CR-V
Comparison Overview
The 2025 Ford Bronco Sport bursts onto the scene with a rugged, adventurous spirit, featuring 181 hp and standard All-Wheel Drive, making it ready for dirt trails right off the lot. In contrast, the 2026 Honda CR-V prioritizes efficient, polished daily driving, boasting superior fuel economy at 30 MPG combined, slightly edging out the Bronco Sport's 27 MPG combined. While the CR-V offers a massive 39.3 cu ft of cargo space compared to the Bronco Sport's 32.5 cu ft, the Bronco stands noticeably taller at 70.2 inches, implying better ground clearance. Priced closely—the CR-V at $30,920 MSRP versus the Bronco Sport at $31,695—the choice boils down to priorities: go-anywhere capability or pavement-pounding efficiency and capacity. The CR-V’s FWD setup makes it less capable off-road than the standard AWD on the Bronco Sport, despite the Bronco having slightly less torque at 190 lb-ft versus the CR-V's 179 lb-ft in the gas-only version provided.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2026 Honda CR-V
The 2026 Honda CR-V wins for commuting due to its superior combined fuel economy of 30 MPG and more comfortable ride height for urban maneuvering.
2026 Honda CR-V
The 2026 Honda CR-V offers significantly more practicality with 39.3 cu ft of cargo capacity compared to the Bronco Sport's 32.5 cu ft.
2025 Ford Bronco Sport
The 2025 Ford Bronco Sport appeals more to driving enthusiasts with its standard All-Wheel Drive and dedicated adventure stance.
2026 Honda CR-V
The 2026 Honda CR-V is the better value proposition, costing $775 less and delivering better fuel efficiency across the board.
Choose the Ford Bronco Sport if...
- You require standard All-Wheel Drive capability for unpredictable weather or mild off-roading maneuvers.
- You prefer the commanding visual presence offered by its greater height (70.2 inches) and rugged styling.
- You value the higher torque output of 190 lb-ft from the standard engine, despite the slightly lower MPG.
Choose the Honda CR-V if...
- Maximum cargo hauling is essential, as the CR-V provides 39.3 cu ft versus the Bronco Sport’s 32.5 cu ft.
- You prioritize highway cruising efficiency, achieving 33 MPG on the highway compared to the Bronco Sport's 30 MPG.
- You are looking for the lower entry price point, with an MSRP of $30,920.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Ford Bronco Sport | Honda CR-V |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 172.7" | 184.8" |
| Width | 74.3" | 73.5" |
| Height | 70.2" | 66.2" |
| Wheelbase | 105.1" | 106.3" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Ford | Honda |
|---|---|---|
| Blind Spot Monitor | ✓ | — |
| Lane Departure Warning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | ✓ | — |
| Driver Attention Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Brake Preparation System | ✓ | — |
| Brake Assist | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LED Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Folding Headrests | ✓ | — |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Engine Immobilizer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Rear Side-Mounted Airbags | — | ✓ |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | — | ✓ |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | — | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | — | ✓ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | — | ✓ |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | — | ✓ |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Ford | Honda |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 1.5 L | 1.5 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 3 | inline 4 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | gas |
| Horsepower | 181 hp @ 6000 rpm | 190 hp @ 6000 rpm |
| Torque | 190 lb-ft @ 3000 rpm | 179 lb-ft @ 1700 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 12 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | ✓ | ✓ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Ford | Honda |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 8-speed shiftable automatic | continuously variable-speed automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | all wheel drive | front wheel drive |
| Hill Descent Control | — | ✓ |
Fuel
| Feature | Ford | Honda |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 25/30 MPG | 28/33 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 27 MPG | 30 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 400.0/480.0 mi. | 392.0/462.0 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 16.0 gal. | 14.0 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Ford | Honda |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Parking Sensors | ✓ | — |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single Zone Climate Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | ✓ | ✓ |
| Interior Air Filtration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless Charging Pad | — | ✓ |
| Front Seatback Storage | — | ✓ |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | — | ✓ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Ford | Honda |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 8.0 in | 9.0 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speaker System | 6 | 4 |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio | ✓ | — |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | 3 months | — |
| Speed Sensitive Volume Control | ✓ | — |
| Stereo Power | — | 160W |
Power Feature
| Feature | Ford | Honda |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 1 | 1 |
| Keyless Entry | ✓ | — |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Remote Keyless Entry | — | ✓ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Ford | Honda |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 41.5 in. | 40.0 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 42.4 in. | 41.3 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 57.3 in. | 57.9 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 55.2 in. | 55.6 in. |
| Seat Material: Premium Cloth | ✓ | — |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | 6-way | — |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 4-way | — |
| Seat Material: Cloth | — | ✓ |
Rearseats
| Feature | Ford | Honda |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 41.7 in. | 38.2 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 36.9 in. | 41.0 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 55.6 in. | 55.9 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 53.4 in. | 52.6 in. |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | ✓ | ✓ |
| Folding Center Armrest | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reclining Rear Seats | — | ✓ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Ford | Honda |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Finish | Painted Alloy | — |
| Wheel Diameter | 17 in | 17 in |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | 225/65R H | 235/65R |
| Spare Tire Type | Temporary | Temporary |
| Spare Tire Location | Inside Mounted | Inside Mounted |
| Wheel Material | — | Steel |
| Wheel Cover Type | — | ✓ |
Suspension
| Feature | Ford | Honda |
|---|---|---|
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | ✓ |
Warranty
| Feature | Ford | Honda |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance | — | 1 yr./ 12000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Ford Bronco Sport and 2026 Honda CR-V.
How significant is the difference in capability given the drivetrain specs?
The Bronco Sport comes standard with All-Wheel Drive, suggesting better traction in slippery conditions or on trails. Conversely, the CR-V utilizes a Front Wheel Drive setup, making it generally less suited for true off-road adventures, though it is more efficient on pavement.
Which crossover is the better choice for long highway road trips regarding fuel consumption?
The 2026 Honda CR-V is the clear winner here, boasting a highway rating of 33 MPG, beating the 2025 Ford Bronco Sport’s 30 MPG highway figure.
Does the smaller size of the Bronco Sport affect city maneuverability?
Yes, the 2025 Ford Bronco Sport is physically shorter in length (172.7 inches vs. 184.8 inches for the CR-V), which can aid in tight urban parking scenarios.
Is the CR-V’s performance penalty noticeable compared to the Bronco Sport?
The CR-V actually produces slightly more horsepower at 190 hp compared to the Bronco Sport's 181 hp, although the Bronco Sport counters with slightly more torque at 190 lb-ft versus the CR-V’s 179 lb-ft.
What is the price difference between these two crossovers?
The 2026 Honda CR-V carries a slightly lower MSRP of $30,920, making it $775 less expensive than the 2025 Ford Bronco Sport, which starts at $31,695.
Which vehicle offers more interior space for passengers and gear?
The larger 2026 Honda CR-V provides substantially more cargo volume at 39.3 cu ft, while the Bronco Sport offers 32.5 cu ft, indicating the CR-V will better accommodate larger family items.
More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool