2025 Ford Bronco Sport vs 2025 Mazda CX-70
Comparison Overview
Deciding between rugged utility and premium performance is the common dilemma when comparing the 2025 Ford Bronco Sport and the 2025 Mazda CX-70. The Bronco Sport leads with efficiency and a lower entry point, starting at $31,695 and achieving a solid 27 MPG combined. This efficiency comes at the cost of power; it offers 181 hp compared to the CX-70's robust 280 hp. Conversely, the significantly larger CX-70—at 200.8 inches long—demands an $8,750 premium, listing at $40,445, but it delivers 332 lb-ft of torque for much quicker acceleration. While the Mazda boasts greater passenger and cargo volume (39.6 cu ft), the Bronco Sport's compact dimensions (172.7 inches long) might suit tight city parking better. Both offer standard AWD and an 8-speed automatic, but the core difference boils down to budget and power versus economy and maneuverability.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2025 Ford Bronco Sport
The Bronco Sport is the clear commuter winner due to its superior 27 MPG combined fuel economy versus the CX-70's 25 MPG.
2025 Mazda CX-70
Families will appreciate the CX-70's larger size, offering more passenger room and 39.6 cu ft of cargo space compared to the Bronco Sport's 32.5 cu ft.
2025 Mazda CX-70
Enthusiasts prioritizing straight-line performance will prefer the CX-70's substantial advantage of 280 hp and 332 lb-ft of torque.
2025 Ford Bronco Sport
The Bronco Sport provides undeniable value by saving buyers $8,750 in initial purchase price while still offering standard AWD.
Choose the Ford Bronco Sport if...
- Your budget is tight, as the Bronco Sport starts $8,750 lower at $31,695.
- Maximizing fuel stops is critical, given its 27 MPG combined rating.
- You need a vehicle that is easier to maneuver and park, measuring only 172.7 inches in length.
Choose the Mazda CX-70 if...
- You need significant power for highway merging or towing, thanks to its 280 hp engine.
- Maximum cargo storage is a priority, as it offers 39.6 cu ft compared to 32.5 cu ft in Car 1.
- You prefer a longer vehicle for better road stability and highway cruising comfort, measuring 200.8 inches long.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Ford Bronco Sport | Mazda CX-70 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 172.7" | 200.8" |
| Width | 74.3" | - |
| Height | 70.2" | 68.2" |
| Wheelbase | 105.1" | 122.8" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Blind Spot Monitor | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Departure Warning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Attention Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Brake Preparation System | ✓ | — |
| Brake Assist | ✓ | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LED Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Folding Headrests | ✓ | — |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | ✓ | — |
| Engine Immobilizer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | — | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes | — | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | — | ✓ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | — | ✓ |
| Self-Leveling Headlights | — | ✓ |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | — | ✓ |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 1.5 L | 3.3 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 3 | inline 6 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | mild hybrid |
| Horsepower | 181 hp @ 6000 rpm | 280 hp @ 5000 rpm |
| Torque | 190 lb-ft @ 3000 rpm | 332 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 12 | 24 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | ✓ | ✓ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 8-speed shiftable automatic | 8-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | all wheel drive | all wheel drive |
| Center Differential Type | — | Limited Slip |
| Hill Descent Control | — | ✓ |
Fuel
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 25/30 MPG | 24/28 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 27 MPG | 25 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 400.0/480.0 mi. | 444.0/518.0 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 16.0 gal. | 18.5 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Parking Sensors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single Zone Climate Control | ✓ | — |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | ✓ | ✓ |
| Interior Air Filtration | ✓ | — |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Transmission Controls on Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Front Parking Sensors | — | ✓ |
| Wireless Charging Pad | — | ✓ |
| Front Seatback Storage | — | ✓ |
| Leather Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Three Zone Climate Control | — | ✓ |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | — | ✓ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 8.0 in | 12.3 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speaker System | 6 | 8 |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio | ✓ | — |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | 3 months | — |
| Speed Sensitive Volume Control | ✓ | ✓ |
Power Feature
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 1 | 4 |
| Keyless Entry | ✓ | ✓ |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Moonroof Type | — | 1st Row Power Glass |
Frontseats
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 41.5 in. | 39.7 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 42.4 in. | 41.7 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 57.3 in. | 59.2 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 55.2 in. | 56.2 in. |
| Seat Material: Premium Cloth | ✓ | — |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | 6-way | — |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 4-way | — |
| Seat Material: Leather | — | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Power Adjustments | — | 8-way |
| Driver Seat Lumbar Support | — | Power |
| Passenger Seat Power Adjustments | — | 4-way |
| Driver Seat Heating | — | Multi-level |
| Passenger Seat Heating | — | Multi-level |
Rearseats
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 41.7 in. | 39.3 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 36.9 in. | 39.4 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 55.6 in. | 58.1 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 53.4 in. | 55.5 in. |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | ✓ | ✓ |
| Folding Center Armrest | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reclining Rear Seats | — | ✓ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Finish | Painted Alloy | — |
| Wheel Diameter | 17 in | — |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | 225/65R H | 265/55R19 |
| Spare Tire Type | Temporary | Temporary |
| Spare Tire Location | Inside Mounted | Inside Mounted |
| Wheel Material | — | Alloy |
| Wheel Size | — | 19 x 8.5 in |
Suspension
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | — |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | — |
| Stabilizer Bar | — | ✓ |
Warranty
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Ford Bronco Sport and 2025 Mazda CX-70.
What is the primary trade-off between the 2025 Bronco Sport and the CX-70?
The main trade-off is cost versus power. The Bronco Sport saves you $8,750 upfront and gets better mileage (27 MPG combined), while the CX-70 offers significantly more power (280 hp vs. 181 hp) for that extra investment.
Is the CX-70 much larger than the Bronco Sport?
Yes, the CX-70 is considerably larger, measuring 200.8 inches in length compared to the Bronco Sport's 172.7 inches, translating directly into better interior cargo capacity (39.6 cu ft vs. 32.5 cu ft).
Which crossover is better for long daily highway commutes?
The 2025 Ford Bronco Sport is slightly more economical for commuting, achieving 30 MPG on the highway compared to the CX-70's 28 MPG highway rating, and it uses less torque-heavy engine tuning for stop-and-go traffic.
Do these two crossovers offer different engine power?
Absolutely; the power difference is stark, with the CX-70 producing 280 hp and 332 lb-ft of torque, whereas the standard Bronco Sport generates 181 hp and 190 lb-ft of torque.
Are there differences in required fuel for these AWD vehicles?
No, both the 2025 Ford Bronco Sport and the 2025 Mazda CX-70 specify the use of regular unleaded fuel, meaning neither requires premium gasoline.
Which vehicle has the taller stance?
Surprisingly, the smaller Bronco Sport is the taller vehicle, measuring 70.2 inches high, while the longer CX-70 sits slightly lower at 68.2 inches high.
More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool