2025 Ford Bronco Sport vs 2025 Mazda CX-50
Comparison Overview
The most significant dimensional divergence lies in length, with the 2025 Mazda CX-50 measuring 185.8 inches compared to the 2025 Ford Bronco Sport's 172.7 inches, resulting in different maneuverability profiles. Performance metrics show the CX-50 leading marginally in output with 187 hp against the Bronco Sport's 181 hp, though the Bronco counters with slightly superior torque at 190 lb-ft versus 185 lb-ft. Fuel efficiency slightly favors the CX-50 with a 28 MPG combined rating compared to the Bronco Sport's 27 MPG combined, although both utilize regular unleaded fuel and AWD. Pricing presents a $1,195 difference, as the CX-50 starts at $30,500 while the Bronco Sport begins at $31,695. Cargo volumes are closely matched, with the Bronco Sport offering 32.5 cu ft versus the CX-50's 31.4 cu ft, but the CX-50 is noticeably shorter in height at 63.5 inches versus 70.2 inches.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2025 Mazda CX-50
The Mazda CX-50 wins for commuters due to its superior combined fuel economy of 28 MPG versus the Bronco Sport's 27 MPG.
2025 Ford Bronco Sport
The Ford Bronco Sport provides marginally more interior utility with 32.5 cubic feet of cargo capacity compared to the CX-50's 31.4 cubic feet.
2025 Ford Bronco Sport
The Bronco Sport is awarded to enthusiasts for delivering higher peak torque output at 190 lb-ft versus the CX-50's 185 lb-ft.
2025 Mazda CX-50
The Mazda CX-50 offers a lower entry price point at $30,500, undercutting the Bronco Sport's $31,695 MSRP.
Choose the Ford Bronco Sport if...
- You prioritize a higher torque rating of 190 lb-ft for off-road capability.
- You need the maximum available cargo space, specifically 32.5 cubic feet.
- You prefer the taller stance indicated by the 70.2-inch height measurement.
Choose the Mazda CX-50 if...
- Your primary concern is the lower initial cost, beginning at $30,500.
- You desire the marginally better efficiency, achieving 28 MPG combined.
- You prefer the increased length of 185.8 inches for a more substantial road presence.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Ford Bronco Sport | Mazda CX-50 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 172.7" | 185.8" |
| Width | 74.3" | 75.6" |
| Height | 70.2" | 63.5" |
| Wheelbase | 105.1" | 110.8" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Blind Spot Monitor | โ | โ |
| Lane Departure Warning | โ | โ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | โ | โ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | โ | โ |
| Driver Attention Alert | โ | โ |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | โ | โ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | โ | โ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | โ | โ |
| Front Head Airbags | โ | โ |
| Rear Head Airbags | โ | โ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | โ | โ |
| Electronic Stability Control | โ | โ |
| Traction Control System | โ | โ |
| LATCH System | โ | โ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | โ | โ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Brake Preparation System | โ | โ |
| Brake Assist | โ | โ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | โ | โ |
| LED Headlights | โ | โ |
| Daytime Running Lights | โ | โ |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | โ | โ |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Folding Headrests | โ | โ |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | โ | โ |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | โ | โ |
| Engine Immobilizer | โ | โ |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | โ | โ |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | โ | โ |
| Automatic Headlights | โ | โ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | โ | โ |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | โ | โ |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | โ | โ |
Engine
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 1.5 L | 2.5 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 3 | inline 4 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | gas |
| Horsepower | 181 hp @ 6000 rpm | 187 hp @ 6000 rpm |
| Torque | 190 lb-ft @ 3000 rpm | 185 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 12 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | โ | โ |
| Cylinder Deactivation | โ | โ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 8-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | all wheel drive | all wheel drive |
Fuel
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 25/30 MPG | 25/31 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 27 MPG | 28 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 400.0/480.0 mi. | 397.5/492.9 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 16.0 gal. | 15.9 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | โ | โ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Electric Power Steering | โ | โ |
| Rear View Camera | โ | โ |
| Rear Parking Sensors | โ | โ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | โ | โ |
| Front Cupholders | โ | โ |
| Rear Cupholders | โ | โ |
| Front Door Pockets | โ | โ |
| Rear Door Pockets | โ | โ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | โ | โ |
| Single Zone Climate Control | โ | โ |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | โ | โ |
| Interior Air Filtration | โ | โ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | โ | โ |
| Front Seatback Storage | โ | โ |
| Leather Steering Wheel | โ | โ |
| Dual Zone Climate Control | โ | โ |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | โ | โ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 8.0 in | 10.3 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | โ | โ |
| Speaker System | 6 | 8 |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | โ | โ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | โ | โ |
| USB Port | โ | โ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | โ | โ |
| Satellite Radio | โ | โ |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | 3 months | โ |
| Speed Sensitive Volume Control | โ | โ |
Power Feature
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 1 | 4 |
| Keyless Entry | โ | โ |
| Heated Mirrors | โ | โ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 41.5 in. | 39.1 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 42.4 in. | 41.7 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 57.3 in. | 55.9 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 55.2 in. | 53.6 in. |
| Seat Material: Premium Cloth | โ | โ |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | โ | โ |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | 6-way | 6-way |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | โ | โ |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 4-way | 4-way |
| Seat Material: Leatherette | โ | โ |
Rearseats
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 41.7 in. | 38.6 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 36.9 in. | 39.8 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 55.6 in. | 53.6 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 53.4 in. | 52.1 in. |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | โ | โ |
| Folding Center Armrest | โ | โ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Finish | Painted Alloy | Painted Alloy |
| Wheel Diameter | 17 in | โ |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | 225/65R H | P225/65R17 |
| Spare Tire Type | Temporary | Temporary |
| Spare Tire Location | Inside Mounted | Inside Mounted |
| Wheel Size | โ | 17 x 7.0 in |
Suspension
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | โ | โ |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | โ | โ |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | โ | โ |
| Front Suspension Type | โ | Independent |
| Stabilizer Bar | โ | โ |
Warranty
| Feature | Ford | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Ford Bronco Sport and 2025 Mazda CX-50.
Which vehicle offers better power delivery based on the specs provided?
The Mazda CX-50 generates slightly more peak horsepower at 187 hp compared to the Bronco Sport's 181 hp. However, the Ford Bronco Sport provides a higher torque figure of 190 lb-ft versus the CX-50's 185 lb-ft.
How do the exterior dimensions impact urban maneuverability?
The 2025 Ford Bronco Sport is significantly shorter in length at 172.7 inches and narrower at 74.3 inches, which generally aids tighter city parking. Conversely, the CX-50 is 13.1 inches longer and 1.3 inches wider.
Is there a meaningful difference in fuel economy between the two crossovers?
Yes, the Mazda CX-50 holds a slight advantage with a 28 MPG combined rating, marginally exceeding the Ford Bronco Sport's 27 MPG combined rating.
What is the cost difference between the two entry-level models?
The 2025 Mazda CX-50 has an MSRP of $30,500, making it $1,195 less expensive than the 2025 Ford Bronco Sport, which starts at $31,695.
Do both vehicles offer similar space for luggage?
Cargo capacities are very close; the Bronco Sport offers 32.5 cu ft, which is 1.1 cubic feet more than the CX-50's 31.4 cu ft.
What is the notable difference in their respective transmissions?
The Bronco Sport utilizes an 8-speed automatic transmission, whereas the CX-50 is equipped with a 6-speed automatic transmission, potentially affecting acceleration smoothness.
More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool