2025 Ford Bronco Sport vs 2025 Mazda CX-50

Ford Bronco Sport

$31,695 ยท Crossover

vs
Mazda CX-50

$30,500 ยท Crossover

Comparison Overview

The most significant dimensional divergence lies in length, with the 2025 Mazda CX-50 measuring 185.8 inches compared to the 2025 Ford Bronco Sport's 172.7 inches, resulting in different maneuverability profiles. Performance metrics show the CX-50 leading marginally in output with 187 hp against the Bronco Sport's 181 hp, though the Bronco counters with slightly superior torque at 190 lb-ft versus 185 lb-ft. Fuel efficiency slightly favors the CX-50 with a 28 MPG combined rating compared to the Bronco Sport's 27 MPG combined, although both utilize regular unleaded fuel and AWD. Pricing presents a $1,195 difference, as the CX-50 starts at $30,500 while the Bronco Sport begins at $31,695. Cargo volumes are closely matched, with the Bronco Sport offering 32.5 cu ft versus the CX-50's 31.4 cu ft, but the CX-50 is noticeably shorter in height at 63.5 inches versus 70.2 inches.

Size Comparison

Performance

Fuel Efficiency

Full Specifications

Our Verdicts

๐Ÿš— Best for Commuters

2025 Mazda CX-50

The Mazda CX-50 wins for commuters due to its superior combined fuel economy of 28 MPG versus the Bronco Sport's 27 MPG.

๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐Ÿ‘งโ€๐Ÿ‘ฆ Best for Families

2025 Ford Bronco Sport

The Ford Bronco Sport provides marginally more interior utility with 32.5 cubic feet of cargo capacity compared to the CX-50's 31.4 cubic feet.

๐ŸŽ๏ธ Best for Enthusiasts

2025 Ford Bronco Sport

The Bronco Sport is awarded to enthusiasts for delivering higher peak torque output at 190 lb-ft versus the CX-50's 185 lb-ft.

๐Ÿ’ฐ Best Value

2025 Mazda CX-50

The Mazda CX-50 offers a lower entry price point at $30,500, undercutting the Bronco Sport's $31,695 MSRP.

Choose the Ford Bronco Sport if...

  • You prioritize a higher torque rating of 190 lb-ft for off-road capability.
  • You need the maximum available cargo space, specifically 32.5 cubic feet.
  • You prefer the taller stance indicated by the 70.2-inch height measurement.

Choose the Mazda CX-50 if...

  • Your primary concern is the lower initial cost, beginning at $30,500.
  • You desire the marginally better efficiency, achieving 28 MPG combined.
  • You prefer the increased length of 185.8 inches for a more substantial road presence.

Key Dimensions

Dimension Ford Bronco Sport Mazda CX-50
Length 172.7" 185.8"
Width 74.3" 75.6"
Height 70.2" 63.5"
Wheelbase 105.1" 110.8"

Features Comparison

Safety
Feature Ford Mazda
Blind Spot Monitor โœ“ โœ“
Lane Departure Warning โœ“ โœ“
Lane Keeping Assist System โœ“ โœ“
Rear Cross Traffic Alert โœ“ โœ“
Driver Attention Alert โœ“ โœ“
Pre-Collision Safety System โœ“ โœ“
Post-Collision Safety System โœ“ โœ“
Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags โœ“ โœ“
Front Head Airbags โœ“ โœ“
Rear Head Airbags โœ“ โœ“
Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation โœ“ โœ“
Electronic Stability Control โœ“ โœ“
Traction Control System โœ“ โœ“
LATCH System โœ“ โœ“
Rear Door Child Safety Locks โœ“ โœ“
Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) 4-Wheel 4-Wheel
Brake Preparation System โœ“ โ€”
Brake Assist โœ“ โœ“
Tire Pressure Monitoring System โœ“ โœ“
LED Headlights โœ“ โœ“
Daytime Running Lights โœ“ โœ“
Front Headrests 2 2
Front Height Adjustable Headrests โœ“ โœ“
Rear Headrests 3 3
Rear Folding Headrests โœ“ โ€”
Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt โœ“ โœ“
Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) โœ“ โ€”
Engine Immobilizer โœ“ โœ“
Front Ventilated Disc Brakes โ€” โœ“
Rear Solid Disc Brakes โ€” โœ“
Automatic Headlights โ€” โœ“
Headlight Delay-Off โ€” โœ“
Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors โ€” โœ“
Rear Height Adjustable Headrests โ€” โœ“
Engine
Feature Ford Mazda
Base Engine Displacement 1.5 L 2.5 L
Number of Cylinders inline 3 inline 4
Base Engine Type gas gas
Horsepower 181 hp @ 6000 rpm 187 hp @ 6000 rpm
Torque 190 lb-ft @ 3000 rpm 185 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm
Number of Valves 12 16
Camshaft Type Double overhead cam (DOHC) Double overhead cam (DOHC)
Variable Valve Timing Variable Variable
Fuel Injection Type โœ“ โœ“
Cylinder Deactivation โ€” โœ“
Drive Train
Feature Ford Mazda
Transmission Type 8-speed shiftable automatic 6-speed shiftable automatic
Drivetrain Type all wheel drive all wheel drive
Fuel
Feature Ford Mazda
Fuel Type regular unleaded regular unleaded
EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) 25/30 MPG 25/31 MPG
EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) 27 MPG 28 MPG
EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) 400.0/480.0 mi. 397.5/492.9 mi.
Fuel Tank Capacity 16.0 gal. 15.9 gal.
Comfort & Convenience
Feature Ford Mazda
Push Button Start โœ“ โœ“
Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel โœ“ โœ“
Audio Controls on Steering Wheel โœ“ โœ“
Cruise Control on Steering Wheel โœ“ โœ“
Electric Power Steering โœ“ โœ“
Rear View Camera โœ“ โœ“
Rear Parking Sensors โœ“ โ€”
Adaptive Cruise Control โœ“ โœ“
Front Cupholders โœ“ โœ“
Rear Cupholders โœ“ โœ“
Front Door Pockets โœ“ โœ“
Rear Door Pockets โœ“ โœ“
Overhead Console with Storage โœ“ โœ“
Single Zone Climate Control โœ“ โ€”
Rear Ventilation Ducts โœ“ โœ“
Interior Air Filtration โœ“ โœ“
Dual Vanity Mirrors โœ“ โœ“
Front Seatback Storage โ€” โœ“
Leather Steering Wheel โ€” โœ“
Dual Zone Climate Control โ€” โœ“
Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors โ€” โœ“
In Car Entertainment
Feature Ford Mazda
Infotainment Display 8.0 in 10.3 in
AM/FM Stereo โœ“ โœ“
Speaker System 6 8
Android Auto (Wireless) โœ“ โœ“
Apple CarPlay (Wireless) โœ“ โœ“
USB Port โœ“ โœ“
USB Port with External Media Control โœ“ โœ“
Satellite Radio โœ“ โ€”
Satellite Radio Trial Period 3 months โ€”
Speed Sensitive Volume Control โœ“ โ€”
Power Feature
Feature Ford Mazda
One-Touch Power Windows 1 4
Keyless Entry โœ“ โœ“
Heated Mirrors โœ“ โœ“
Frontseats
Feature Ford Mazda
Front Head Room 41.5 in. 39.1 in.
Front Leg Room 42.4 in. 41.7 in.
Front Shoulder Room 57.3 in. 55.9 in.
Front Hip Room 55.2 in. 53.6 in.
Seat Material: Premium Cloth โœ“ โ€”
Front Seat Type: Bucket โœ“ โœ“
Driver Seat Manual Adjustments 6-way 6-way
Driver Seat Height Adjustment โœ“ โœ“
Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments 4-way 4-way
Seat Material: Leatherette โ€” โœ“
Rearseats
Feature Ford Mazda
Rear Head Room 41.7 in. 38.6 in.
Rear Leg Room 36.9 in. 39.8 in.
Rear Shoulder Room 55.6 in. 53.6 in.
Rear Hip Room 53.4 in. 52.1 in.
Split-Folding Rear Seatback โœ“ โœ“
Folding Center Armrest โœ“ โœ“
Tires and Wheels
Feature Ford Mazda
Wheel Finish Painted Alloy Painted Alloy
Wheel Diameter 17 in โ€”
Tire Type All Season All Season
Tire Size 225/65R H P225/65R17
Spare Tire Type Temporary Temporary
Spare Tire Location Inside Mounted Inside Mounted
Wheel Size โ€” 17 x 7.0 in
Suspension
Feature Ford Mazda
Four-Wheel Independent Suspension โœ“ โ€”
Front Stabilizer Bar โœ“ โ€”
Rear Stabilizer Bar โœ“ โ€”
Front Suspension Type โ€” Independent
Stabilizer Bar โ€” โœ“
Warranty
Feature Ford Mazda
Basic Warranty 3 yr./ 36000 mi. 3 yr./ 36000 mi.
Drivetrain Warranty 5 yr./ 60000 mi. 5 yr./ 60000 mi.
Corrosion/Rust Warranty 5 yr./ unlimited mi. 5 yr./ unlimited mi.
Roadside Assistance 5 yr./ 60000 mi. 3 yr./ 36000 mi.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about comparing the 2025 Ford Bronco Sport and 2025 Mazda CX-50.

Which vehicle offers better power delivery based on the specs provided?

The Mazda CX-50 generates slightly more peak horsepower at 187 hp compared to the Bronco Sport's 181 hp. However, the Ford Bronco Sport provides a higher torque figure of 190 lb-ft versus the CX-50's 185 lb-ft.

How do the exterior dimensions impact urban maneuverability?

The 2025 Ford Bronco Sport is significantly shorter in length at 172.7 inches and narrower at 74.3 inches, which generally aids tighter city parking. Conversely, the CX-50 is 13.1 inches longer and 1.3 inches wider.

Is there a meaningful difference in fuel economy between the two crossovers?

Yes, the Mazda CX-50 holds a slight advantage with a 28 MPG combined rating, marginally exceeding the Ford Bronco Sport's 27 MPG combined rating.

What is the cost difference between the two entry-level models?

The 2025 Mazda CX-50 has an MSRP of $30,500, making it $1,195 less expensive than the 2025 Ford Bronco Sport, which starts at $31,695.

Do both vehicles offer similar space for luggage?

Cargo capacities are very close; the Bronco Sport offers 32.5 cu ft, which is 1.1 cubic feet more than the CX-50's 31.4 cu ft.

What is the notable difference in their respective transmissions?

The Bronco Sport utilizes an 8-speed automatic transmission, whereas the CX-50 is equipped with a 6-speed automatic transmission, potentially affecting acceleration smoothness.

More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)

View all

Vehicle Details

Compare More Vehicles

Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once

Open Comparison Tool