2025 Dodge Durango vs 2025 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Comparison Overview
Deciding between raw power and refined luxury often plagues SUV shoppers, especially when comparing the practical 2025 Dodge Durango against the premium 2025 Range Rover Evoque. The Durango leads the performance charge, boasting 295 hp from its engine compared to the Evoque's 246 hp. However, the Evoque shines in efficiency, achieving 22 combined MPG versus the Durango's 20 combined MPG, though the Durango does accept regular unleaded while the Evoque prefers premium fuel. The size difference is dramatic: the Durango stretches to 200.8 inches long, offering a more substantial road presence, while the Evoque prioritizes maneuverability at a length of 172.1 inches. Furthermore, the price gap is significant, with the Durango starting at $38,495 while the Evoque commands $49,900. For shoppers prioritizing lower entry cost and straightforward muscle, the Durango makes a compelling case despite its slightly higher fuel consumption.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2025 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
The Evoque wins for commuting due to its better fuel economy at 22 combined MPG and smaller dimensions for easier city maneuvering.
2025 Dodge Durango
The Durango is likely better suited for families due to its significantly larger overall size (200.8 inches long) suggesting more interior space.
2025 Dodge Durango
The Durango appeals more to enthusiasts with its higher output of 295 horsepower and standard rear-wheel drive architecture.
2025 Dodge Durango
The Durango offers better perceived value, undercutting the Evoque's starting MSRP by $11,405.
Choose the Dodge Durango if...
- You prioritize immediate muscle, as the Durango delivers 295 hp compared to the Evoque's 246 hp.
- Budget is a primary concern, with the Durango starting nearly $11,500 less at $38,495.
- You prefer using regular unleaded fuel over the Evoque's premium recommendation.
Choose the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque if...
- You frequently drive in inclement weather, benefiting from the Evoque's standard All-Wheel Drive system.
- You need the most cargo space in a smaller footprint, as the Evoque offers 21.6 cu ft despite being shorter.
- Maximizing fuel efficiency is key, as the Evoque achieves 27 Highway MPG versus the Durango's 25 Highway MPG.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Dodge Durango | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 200.8" | 172.1" |
| Width | 75.8" | - |
| Height | 72.1" | 64.9" |
| Wheelbase | 119.8" | 105.6" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Dodge | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Blind Spot Monitor | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | ✓ | — |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Third Row Head Airbags | ✓ | — |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Brake Drying | ✓ | — |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | — |
| Brake Preparation System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Brake Assist | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | ✓ | ✓ |
| LED Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Folding Headrests | ✓ | — |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Engine Immobilizer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | — | ✓ |
| Driver Attention Alert | — | ✓ |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | — | ✓ |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | — | ✓ |
| Self-Leveling Headlights | — | ✓ |
| Front Fog Lights | — | ✓ |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | — | ✓ |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Dodge | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 3.6 L | 2.0 L |
| Number of Cylinders | V6 | inline 4 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | gas |
| Horsepower | 295 hp @ 6400 rpm | 246 hp @ 5500 rpm |
| Torque | 260 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm | 269 lb-ft @ 1300 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 24 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | — | ✓ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Dodge | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 8-speed shiftable automatic | 9-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | rear wheel drive | all wheel drive |
| Hill Descent Control | — | ✓ |
Fuel
| Feature | Dodge | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | regular unleaded | premium unleaded (recommended) |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 18/25 MPG | 20/27 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 20 MPG | 22 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 442.8/615.0 mi. | 354.0/477.9 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 24.6 gal. | 17.7 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Dodge | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | — |
| Transmission Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Parking Sensors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control | ✓ | — |
| Universal Remote Transmitter | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| 3rd Row Cupholders | ✓ | — |
| Front Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Seatback Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Leather Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simulated Alloy Trim on Steering Wheel | ✓ | — |
| Heated Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Three Zone Climate Control | ✓ | — |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts with Fan Control | ✓ | — |
| Interior Air Filtration | ✓ | — |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Auto-Dimming Rearview Mirror | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cargo Floor Mats | ✓ | — |
| Power Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Front Parking Sensors | — | ✓ |
| Wireless Charging Pad | — | ✓ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | — | ✓ |
| Dual Zone Climate Control | — | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | — | ✓ |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | — | ✓ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Dodge | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 10.1 in | 11.4 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speaker System | 6 | 12 |
| Android Auto (Wired) | ✓ | — |
| Apple CarPlay (Wired) | ✓ | — |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| Auxiliary Audio Input | ✓ | — |
| USB Port with External Media Control | ✓ | — |
| Satellite Radio | With Real Time Traffic | ✓ |
| Meridian Speakers | — | ✓ |
| Stereo Power | — | 400W |
| Subwoofer Count | — | 1 |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | — | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | — | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | — | 3 months |
| Speed Sensitive Volume Control | — | ✓ |
Power Feature
| Feature | Dodge | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 2 | 4 |
| Keyless Entry | ✓ | ✓ |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Moonroof Type | — | 1st Row Power Glass |
Frontseats
| Feature | Dodge | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 39.9 in. | 37.4 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 40.3 in. | 40.0 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 58.5 in. | 56.6 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 57.0 in. | — |
| Seat Material: Cloth | ✓ | — |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Power Adjustments | 8-way | 8-way |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Lumbar Support | Power | Power |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 4-way | — |
| Passenger Seat Folding Capability | ✓ | — |
| Driver Seat Heating | Multi-level | Multi-level |
| Passenger Seat Heating | Multi-level | Multi-level |
| Seat Material: Leather | — | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Memory Settings | — | 3 |
| Passenger Seat Power Adjustments | — | 6-way |
| Passenger Seat Height Adjustment | — | ✓ |
| Passenger Seat Lumbar Support | — | Power |
Rearseats
| Feature | Dodge | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 39.8 in. | 38.1 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 38.6 in. | 34.0 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 57.7 in. | 55.4 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 55.5 in. | — |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reclining Rear Seats | ✓ | — |
| Folding Center Armrest | ✓ | ✓ |
| Manual Folding Third Row Seat | ✓ | — |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Dodge | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Finish | Painted Alloy | — |
| Wheel Size | 18 x 8.0 in | 18 x 8.0 in |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | 265/60R18 | R18 |
| Spare Tire Type | Temporary | Temporary |
| Spare Tire Location | Underbody Mounted | Inside Mounted |
| Wheel Material | — | Alloy |
Suspension
| Feature | Dodge | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | — |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | — | ✓ |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | — | ✓ |
Warranty
| Feature | Dodge | Land Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 6 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Dodge Durango and 2025 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
How much larger is the 2025 Durango compared to the Evoque?
The Durango is substantially larger, measuring 200.8 inches in length compared to the Evoque's 172.1 inches. This nearly 29-inch difference in length suggests the Durango will offer superior cabin and potential cargo volume, even if the Evoque shows slightly better dedicated cargo capacity listed at 21.6 cu ft versus the Durango's 17.2 cu ft.
Is the Durango significantly more powerful than the Evoque?
Yes, the Durango packs a 49 horsepower advantage, putting out 295 hp against the Evoque's 246 hp. While the Evoque counters with slightly more torque at 269 lb-ft compared to the Durango's 260 lb-ft, the raw horsepower deficit makes the Durango the quicker-feeling vehicle.
Which vehicle is more economical for daily fuel stops?
The Durango is more economical regarding fuel type, accepting regular unleaded gasoline. The Range Rover Evoque specifies a premium unleaded fuel recommendation, which typically results in higher running costs despite its slightly better official efficiency numbers (22 combined MPG vs. 20 combined MPG).
What does the difference in Drive Type mean for buyers?
The Durango comes standard with Rear-Wheel Drive, appealing to those who prefer that setup or its performance implications. Conversely, the Evoque includes All-Wheel Drive standard, offering better traction management in slippery conditions right out of the box.
How does the massive price gap affect the overall comparison?
The $11,405 starting MSRP difference is a major deciding factor, placing the Durango firmly in the mainstream utility segment while the Evoque competes in the entry-level luxury sphere. Buyers prioritizing budget will find the Durango immediately more appealing, while those focused on prestige and luxury refinement will lean toward the Evoque.
Does the smaller Evoque actually have more practical cargo room?
Surprisingly, yes; the Evoque lists 21.6 cu ft of cargo capacity, which is more than the Durango's 17.2 cu ft, likely due to how the measurements are taken or packaging efficiency in the smaller vehicle. However, the Durango’s significantly larger exterior dimensions suggest it has more usable space overall for bulky items.
More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool