2025 Chevrolet Trax vs 2025 Mazda CX-5
Comparison Overview
Deciding between budget-friendly practicality and premium features often boils down to the 2025 Chevrolet Trax versus the 2025 Mazda CX-5. The Trax immediately appeals with its starting MSRP of just $20,500, offering substantial savings compared to the CX-5's $28,770 price tag—a difference of $8,270. While the CX-5 is the power player with 187 hp versus the Trax's 137 hp, the Chevy fights back hard on efficiency, achieving 30 combined MPG versus the Mazda's 25 combined MPG. Although the CX-5 provides more space with 30.8 cu ft of cargo room to the Trax's 25.6 cu ft, buyers prioritizing monthly savings will notice the 5 MPG advantage the Trax carries in daily driving, making the cheaper and thriftier option a strong contender for most drivers.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2025 Chevrolet Trax
The 2025 Chevrolet Trax wins for commuters due to its significantly lower MSRP and better fuel economy, hitting 30 combined MPG.
2025 Mazda CX-5
The 2025 Mazda CX-5 is better suited for families needing space, offering 30.8 cu ft of cargo capacity compared to the Trax's 25.6 cu ft.
2025 Mazda CX-5
Enthusiasts will prefer the CX-5, as it offers 50 more horsepower (187 hp vs. 137 hp) and standard All-Wheel Drive.
2025 Chevrolet Trax
The Trax is the clear value champion, saving buyers over $8,000 upfront while delivering superior fuel efficiency.
Choose the Chevrolet Trax if...
- Your primary concern is budget, leveraging the $20,500 MSRP against the CX-5's higher cost.
- You prioritize fuel savings, as the Trax achieves 32 highway MPG versus the CX-5's 29 MPG.
- You prefer a slightly smaller footprint for easier city parking (178.6 inches long).
Choose the Mazda CX-5 if...
- You need more hauling ability, thanks to the CX-5's best-in-class cargo capacity of 30.8 cu ft.
- You frequently drive in slick conditions, as the CX-5 comes standard with All-Wheel Drive.
- You desire better acceleration, utilizing the 187 hp engine instead of the Trax's 137 hp.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Chevrolet Trax | Mazda CX-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 178.6" | 180.1" |
| Width | 71.8" | 72.6" |
| Height | 61.4" | 66.1" |
| Wheelbase | 106.0" | 106.2" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Chevrolet | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Lane Departure Warning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Rear Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | — |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | ✓ | ✓ |
| LED Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Headrests | 2 | 3 |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | ✓ | — |
| Engine Immobilizer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Blind Spot Monitor | — | ✓ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | — | ✓ |
| Brake Preparation System | — | ✓ |
| Brake Assist | — | ✓ |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | — | ✓ |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Chevrolet | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 1.2 L | 2.5 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 3 | inline 4 |
| Base Engine Type | flex-fuel (FFV) | gas |
| Horsepower | 137 hp @ 5000 rpm | 187 hp @ 6000 rpm |
| Torque | 162 lb-ft @ 2500 rpm | 186 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 12 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | ✓ | ✓ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Chevrolet | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | front wheel drive | all wheel drive |
| Center Differential Type | — | Limited Slip |
Fuel
| Feature | Chevrolet | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | regular unleaded | regular unleaded |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 28/32 MPG | 23/29 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 30 MPG | 25 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 369.6/422.4 mi. | 351.9/443.7 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 13.2 gal. | 15.3 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Chevrolet | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control | ✓ | — |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Single Zone Climate Control | ✓ | — |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | ✓ | — |
| Interior Air Filtration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Push Button Start | — | ✓ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | — | ✓ |
| Rear Cupholders | — | ✓ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | — | ✓ |
| Front Seatback Storage | — | ✓ |
| Leather Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Air Conditioning | — | ✓ |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | — | ✓ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Chevrolet | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 8.0 in | 10.3 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speaker System | 4 | 4 |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | ✓ | — |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | ✓ | — |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| Auxiliary Audio Input | ✓ | — |
| USB Port with External Media Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio | ✓ | — |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | 3 months | — |
| Speed Sensitive Volume Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Android Auto (Wired) | — | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wired) | — | ✓ |
| Memory Card Slot | — | ✓ |
Power Feature
| Feature | Chevrolet | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 4 | 4 |
| Remote Keyless Entry | ✓ | ✓ |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Chevrolet | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 39.6 in. | 39.7 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 41.9 in. | 41.0 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 55.7 in. | 57.1 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 52.1 in. | 55.2 in. |
| Seat Material: Cloth | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | 6-way | 6-way |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 4-way | 4-way |
Rearseats
| Feature | Chevrolet | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 38.1 in. | 39.0 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 38.7 in. | 39.6 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 54.3 in. | 54.8 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 45.8 in. | 55.3 in. |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reclining Rear Seats | — | ✓ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Chevrolet | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Finish | Painted Steel | Painted Alloy |
| Wheel Cover Type | Full | — |
| Wheel Diameter | 17 in | — |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | 225/60R17 | P225/65R17 |
| Spare Tire Type | Temporary | Temporary |
| Spare Tire Location | Inside Mounted | Inside Mounted |
| Wheel Size | — | 17 x 7.0 in |
Suspension
| Feature | Chevrolet | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Front Suspension Type | Independent | — |
| Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | — |
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | — | ✓ |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | — | ✓ |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | — | ✓ |
Warranty
| Feature | Chevrolet | Mazda |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 6 yr./ 100000 mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance | 1 yr./ unlimited mi. | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Chevrolet Trax and 2025 Mazda CX-5.
How much more powerful is the Mazda CX-5 compared to the Chevy Trax?
The 2025 Mazda CX-5 produces 187 horsepower and 186 lb-ft of torque, which is a significant jump from the 2025 Chevrolet Trax's 137 horsepower and 162 lb-ft of torque. This 50 hp difference means the CX-5 will feel noticeably quicker when merging onto highways.
Is the upfront cost difference between these two crossovers worth it?
Yes, the price difference is substantial, with the CX-5 starting at $28,770 compared to the Trax's $20,500 MSRP, saving you $8,270 immediately. However, you must weigh this saving against the CX-5’s standard All-Wheel Drive and superior horsepower.
Which crossover offers better gas mileage for long commutes?
The 2025 Chevrolet Trax is the clear winner here, delivering 30 combined MPG (28 City/32 Highway). The Mazda CX-5 trails with 25 combined MPG (23 City/29 Highway), meaning you'll spend more time and money at the pump with the CX-5.
Does the taller CX-5 translate to better utility inside the cabin?
The Mazda CX-5 is physically taller (66.1 inches vs. 61.4 inches) and offers more space for cargo, boasting 30.8 cu ft compared to the Trax's 25.6 cu ft. This extra space is excellent for strollers or luggage.
Are there major differences in the type of driving surface each car is best suited for?
The Chevy Trax is FWD and relies on its regular unleaded fuel efficiency for daily driving. Conversely, the Mazda CX-5 comes standard with AWD, making it better equipped for poor weather conditions or light off-pavement exploration.
How do the overall dimensions compare for parking purposes?
The Trax is slightly more compact, measuring 178.6 inches long and 71.8 inches wide. The CX-5 is negligibly larger at 180.1 inches long and 72.6 inches wide, so the difference in maneuverability will be minimal in most urban settings.
More Budget SUVs Under $30,000
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool