2025 Chevrolet Equinox vs 2025 Mazda CX-30

Chevrolet Equinox

$28,600 Β· Crossover

vs
Mazda CX-30

$25,195 Β· Crossover

Comparison Overview

Deciding between the newly redesigned 2025 Chevrolet Equinox and the sporty 2025 Mazda CX-30 often boils down to space versus sophistication on a budget. The Equinox starts at a higher MSRP of $28,600 compared to the CX-30's appealing $25,195, a difference of $3,405, which is significant right out of the gate. While the Equinox offers substantially more room with 29.8 cubic feet of cargo space versus the CX-30's 20.2 cu ft, it trails slightly in efficiency, achieving a combined 27 MPG versus the Mazda's 29 MPG combined. Performance is closer than expected; the CX-30 has slightly more horsepower at 191 hp against the Equinox's 175 hp, though both utilize regular unleaded fuel. If maximizing interior volume is the top priority, the larger dimensions of the Equinox (183.2 inches long) clearly win, but for a more agile feel, the smaller CX-30 might fit better in tight urban environments.

Size Comparison

Performance

Fuel Efficiency

Full Specifications

Our Verdicts

πŸš— Best for Commuters

2025 Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 wins for commuters due to its superior combined fuel economy of 29 MPG and standard All-Wheel Drive, making it slightly more economical for daily driving.

πŸ‘¨β€πŸ‘©β€πŸ‘§β€πŸ‘¦ Best for Families

2025 Chevrolet Equinox

The 2025 Chevrolet Equinox is the family choice because its generous 29.8 cu ft cargo capacity easily accommodates more gear than the CX-30's 20.2 cu ft.

🏎️ Best for Enthusiasts

2025 Mazda CX-30

The CX-30 offers a sportier experience with 191 horsepower and a 6-speed shiftable automatic transmission, beating the Equinox's 175 hp CVT setup.

πŸ’° Best Value

2025 Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 provides better overall fuel economy (29 MPG combined) and costs $3,405 less than the Equinox, offering superior value.

Choose the Chevrolet Equinox if...

  • You prioritize sheer hauling ability, as the Equinox boasts 29.8 cubic feet of cargo space.
  • You prefer the familiarity and potentially more commanding view offered by the Equinox’s larger exterior dimensions (183.2 inches long).
  • You are not concerned about maximizing highway MPG, accepting the Equinox's 27 MPG combined rating.

Choose the Mazda CX-30 if...

  • You need the enhanced traction of standard All-Wheel Drive without upgrading trim levels.
  • You want the better highway fuel efficiency, achieving up to 33 MPG on the highway.
  • You are looking to save upfront cash, as the CX-30 starts $3,405 cheaper at $25,195.

Key Dimensions

Dimension Chevrolet Equinox Mazda CX-30
Length 183.2" 173.0"
Width 74.9" 70.7"
Height 65.6" 61.7"
Wheelbase 107.5" 104.4"

Features Comparison

Safety
Feature Chevrolet Mazda
Blind Spot Monitor βœ“ βœ“
Lane Departure Warning βœ“ βœ“
Lane Keeping Assist System βœ“ βœ“
Rear Cross Traffic Alert βœ“ βœ“
Pre-Collision Safety System βœ“ βœ“
Post-Collision Safety System βœ“ βœ“
Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags βœ“ βœ“
Front Head Airbags βœ“ βœ“
Rear Head Airbags βœ“ βœ“
Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation βœ“ βœ“
Electronic Stability Control βœ“ βœ“
Traction Control System βœ“ βœ“
LATCH System βœ“ βœ“
Rear Door Child Safety Locks βœ“ βœ“
Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) 4-Wheel 4-Wheel
Front Ventilated Disc Brakes βœ“ βœ“
Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes βœ“ β€”
Tire Pressure Monitoring System βœ“ βœ“
Automatic Headlights βœ“ βœ“
Headlight Delay-Off βœ“ βœ“
LED Headlights βœ“ βœ“
Daytime Running Lights βœ“ βœ“
Front Headrests 2 2
Front Height Adjustable Headrests βœ“ βœ“
Rear Headrests 2 3
Rear Height Adjustable Headrests βœ“ βœ“
Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt βœ“ βœ“
Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) βœ“ β€”
Engine Immobilizer βœ“ βœ“
Driver Attention Alert β€” βœ“
Dual Rear Side-Mounted Airbags β€” βœ“
Rear Solid Disc Brakes β€” βœ“
Brake Assist β€” βœ“
Engine
Feature Chevrolet Mazda
Base Engine Displacement 1.5 L 2.5 L
Number of Cylinders inline 4 inline 4
Base Engine Type gas gas
Horsepower 175 hp @ 5600 rpm 191 hp @ 6000 rpm
Torque 184 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm 186 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm
Number of Valves 16 16
Camshaft Type Double overhead cam (DOHC) Double overhead cam (DOHC)
Variable Valve Timing Variable Variable
Fuel Injection Type βœ“ βœ“
Cylinder Deactivation β€” βœ“
Drive Train
Feature Chevrolet Mazda
Transmission Type continuously variable-speed automatic 6-speed shiftable automatic
Drivetrain Type front wheel drive all wheel drive
Fuel
Feature Chevrolet Mazda
Fuel Type regular unleaded regular unleaded
EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) 26/28 MPG 26/33 MPG
EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) 27 MPG 29 MPG
EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) 384.8/414.4 mi. 330.2/419.1 mi.
Fuel Tank Capacity 14.8 gal. 12.7 gal.
Comfort & Convenience
Feature Chevrolet Mazda
Push Button Start βœ“ βœ“
Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel βœ“ βœ“
Audio Controls on Steering Wheel βœ“ βœ“
Cruise Control on Steering Wheel βœ“ βœ“
Electric Power Steering βœ“ βœ“
Rear View Camera βœ“ βœ“
Rear Parking Sensors βœ“ β€”
Adaptive Cruise Control βœ“ βœ“
Front Cupholders βœ“ βœ“
Rear Cupholders βœ“ βœ“
Front Door Pockets βœ“ βœ“
Rear Door Pockets βœ“ βœ“
Overhead Console with Storage βœ“ β€”
Front Seatback Storage βœ“ β€”
Heated Steering Wheel βœ“ β€”
Single Zone Climate Control βœ“ βœ“
Interior Air Filtration βœ“ β€”
Dual Vanity Mirrors βœ“ βœ“
Cargo Floor Mats βœ“ β€”
In Car Entertainment
Feature Chevrolet Mazda
Infotainment Display 11.3 in 8.8 in
AM/FM Stereo βœ“ βœ“
Speaker System 6 6
Android Auto (Wireless) βœ“ β€”
Apple CarPlay (Wireless) βœ“ β€”
USB Port βœ“ βœ“
Auxiliary Audio Input βœ“ β€”
USB Port with External Media Control βœ“ βœ“
Satellite Radio βœ“ β€”
Satellite Radio Trial Period 3 months β€”
Speed Sensitive Volume Control βœ“ β€”
Android Auto (Wired) β€” βœ“
Apple CarPlay (Wired) β€” βœ“
Power Feature
Feature Chevrolet Mazda
One-Touch Power Windows 4 4
Keyless Entry βœ“ β€”
Heated Mirrors βœ“ βœ“
Remote Keyless Entry β€” βœ“
Frontseats
Feature Chevrolet Mazda
Front Head Room 40.0 in. 38.1 in.
Front Leg Room 40.9 in. 41.7 in.
Front Shoulder Room 57.7 in. 55.6 in.
Front Hip Room 54.2 in. 54.6 in.
Seat Material: Cloth βœ“ βœ“
Front Seat Type: Bucket βœ“ βœ“
Driver Seat Manual Adjustments 6-way 6-way
Driver Seat Height Adjustment βœ“ βœ“
Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments 4-way 4-way
Driver Seat Heating Multi-level β€”
Passenger Seat Heating Multi-level β€”
Rearseats
Feature Chevrolet Mazda
Rear Head Room 39.2 in. 38.3 in.
Rear Leg Room 39.9 in. 36.3 in.
Rear Shoulder Room 55.8 in. 53.6 in.
Rear Hip Room 51.7 in. 53.2 in.
Split-Folding Rear Seatback βœ“ βœ“
Folding Center Armrest βœ“ β€”
Reclining Rear Seats β€” βœ“
Tires and Wheels
Feature Chevrolet Mazda
Wheel Finish Painted Alloy Painted Alloy
Wheel Diameter 17 in β€”
Tire Type All Season All Season
Tire Size 235/65R17 215/65R16
Spare Tire Type Temporary Temporary
Spare Tire Location Inside Mounted Inside Mounted
Wheel Size β€” 16 x 6.5 in
Suspension
Feature Chevrolet Mazda
Four-Wheel Independent Suspension βœ“ β€”
Front Stabilizer Bar βœ“ β€”
Rear Stabilizer Bar βœ“ β€”
Front Suspension Type β€” Independent
Stabilizer Bar β€” βœ“
Warranty
Feature Chevrolet Mazda
Basic Warranty 3 yr./ 36000 mi. 3 yr./ 36000 mi.
Drivetrain Warranty 5 yr./ 60000 mi. 5 yr./ 60000 mi.
Corrosion/Rust Warranty 6 yr./ 100000 mi. 5 yr./ unlimited mi.
Roadside Assistance 5 yr./ 60000 mi. 3 yr./ 36000 mi.
Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance 1 yr./ unlimited mi. β€”

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about comparing the 2025 Chevrolet Equinox and 2025 Mazda CX-30.

How much bigger is the Equinox cargo area compared to the CX-30?

The 2025 Chevrolet Equinox offers significantly more hauling capacity with 29.8 cubic feet of space behind the rear seats. In contrast, the 2025 Mazda CX-30 provides only 20.2 cubic feet, making the Equinox the clear winner for large grocery runs or luggage.

Which vehicle gets better gas mileage for my daily commute?

The Mazda CX-30 is the more efficient choice, achieving a combined 29 MPG (26 city/33 highway) compared to the Equinox's 27 MPG combined (26 city/28 highway). If efficiency is key, the CX-30 is the better option.

Does the horsepower difference matter between these two crossovers?

Yes, it offers a slightly peppier feel in the Mazda; the CX-30 generates 191 horsepower, while the Equinox produces 175 horsepower. This power difference is paired with the CX-30’s more engaging 6-speed automatic compared to the Equinox's CVT.

What is the primary reason to choose the Equinox if it costs more?

The main draw for the slightly more expensive Equinox, starting at $28,600, is the added passenger and storage volume reflected in its larger overall size. Its greater width (74.9 inches) and length offer a noticeably roomier cabin experience.

Is the CX-30’s AWD worth sacrificing cargo space for?

For drivers facing varied weather, the CX-30’s standard All-Wheel Drive is a major advantage over the Equinox’s standard Front Wheel Drive setup. You must weigh that against losing about 9.6 cubic feet of potential cargo space.

Are these vehicles premium vehicles, given their price points?

Both vehicles start well under the luxury threshold, with the CX-30 starting at $25,195 and the Equinox at $28,600. Both run on regular unleaded fuel, suggesting they are mainstream, value-oriented crossovers.

More Budget SUVs Under $30,000

View all

Vehicle Details

Compare More Vehicles

Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once

Open Comparison Tool