2025 Chevrolet Blazer vs 2025 Toyota 4Runner
Comparison Overview
The 2025 Chevrolet Blazer grabs attention with its sleek crossover styling and slightly better efficiency, boasting a combined 25 MPG, though it recommends premium fuel for its 228 hp output. In stark contrast, the rugged 2025 Toyota 4Runner stands taller and wider, offering a commanding presence and significantly more grunt with 278 hp and 317 lb-ft of torque, albeit consuming more fuel at 22 MPG combined. While the Blazer is substantially more affordable, starting at $35,400 compared to the 4Runner's $41,270 entry price, the 4Runner compensates with a massive 48.4 cu ft of cargo capacity versus the Blazer's 30.5 cu ft. This comparison pits efficiency and affordability against brute power and utility, highlighted by the 50 hp advantage the 4Runner holds.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2025 Chevrolet Blazer
The 2025 Chevrolet Blazer wins for commuters due to its superior fuel economy rating of 25 MPG combined.
2025 Toyota 4Runner
The 2025 Toyota 4Runner provides significantly more utility with a cargo capacity of 48.4 cubic feet.
2025 Toyota 4Runner
The 4Runner appeals more to driving enthusiasts with its robust 278 hp and higher torque figure of 317 lb-ft.
2025 Chevrolet Blazer
The Blazer offers a lower barrier to entry with an MSRP of $35,400, creating better immediate value over the 4Runner's $41,270.
Choose the Chevrolet Blazer if...
- You prioritize daily efficiency and want a combined 25 MPG rating.
- You need to keep initial costs down, as the Blazer starts $5,870 cheaper.
- You prefer a lower stance typical of a crossover for easier loading and entry.
Choose the Toyota 4Runner if...
- You need maximum hauling space, evidenced by its massive 48.4 cu ft cargo capacity.
- You value outright power, benefiting from 278 hp and 317 lb-ft of torque.
- You prefer running on regular unleaded fuel rather than the Blazer's recommended premium.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Chevrolet Blazer | Toyota 4Runner |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 191.9" | 194.9" |
| Width | 76.7" | 78.0" |
| Height | 67.0" | 72.6" |
| Wheelbase | 113.0" | 112.2" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Chevrolet | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Lane Departure Warning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Third Row Head Airbags | ✓ | — |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Brake Assist | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | ✓ | ✓ |
| LED Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Headrests | 2 | 3 |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Engine Immobilizer | ✓ | — |
| Blind Spot Monitor | — | ✓ |
| Front Cross Traffic Alert | — | ✓ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | — | ✓ |
| Front Fog Lights | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Chevrolet | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 2.0 L | 2.4 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 4 | inline 4 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | gas |
| Horsepower | 228 hp @ 5000 rpm | 278 hp @ 6000 rpm |
| Torque | 258 lb-ft @ 1500 rpm | 317 lb-ft @ 1700 rpm |
| Number of Valves | 16 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Double overhead cam (DOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cylinder Deactivation | ✓ | — |
Drive Train
| Feature | Chevrolet | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 9-speed shiftable automatic | 8-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | front wheel drive | rear wheel drive |
Fuel
| Feature | Chevrolet | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | premium unleaded (recommended) | regular unleaded |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 22/29 MPG | 20/26 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 25 MPG | 22 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 426.8/562.6 mi. | 380.0/494.0 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 19.4 gal. | 19.0 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Chevrolet | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cruise Control | ✓ | — |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| 3rd Row Cupholders | ✓ | — |
| Front Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Seatback Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Zone Climate Control | ✓ | — |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | ✓ | ✓ |
| Interior Air Filtration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Sun Sensor | ✓ | — |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | — | ✓ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | — | ✓ |
| Leather Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Simulated Alloy Trim on Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Single Zone Climate Control | — | ✓ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Chevrolet | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 10.2 in | 8.0 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speaker System | 6 | 8 |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| Auxiliary Audio Input | ✓ | — |
| USB Port with External Media Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | 3 months | 3 months |
| Speed Sensitive Volume Control | ✓ | — |
Power Feature
| Feature | Chevrolet | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 4 | 4 |
| Keyless Entry | ✓ | ✓ |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Chevrolet | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 39.8 in. | 39.7 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 41.0 in. | 41.8 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 59.1 in. | 58.0 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 55.6 in. | 55.2 in. |
| Seat Material: Premium Cloth | ✓ | — |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Power Adjustments | 8-way | — |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Seat Manual Adjustments | 4-way | 6-way |
| Driver Seat Heating | Multi-level | — |
| Passenger Seat Heating | Multi-level | — |
| Seat Material: Cloth | — | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Manual Adjustments | — | 6-way |
| Driver Seat Lumbar Support | — | Power |
| Passenger Seat Height Adjustment | — | ✓ |
Rearseats
| Feature | Chevrolet | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 38.6 in. | 37.8 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 39.6 in. | 34.8 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 58.6 in. | 57.8 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 54.2 in. | 56.1 in. |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | ✓ | ✓ |
| Folding Center Armrest | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reclining Rear Seats | — | ✓ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Chevrolet | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Finish | Painted Alloy | Painted Alloy |
| Wheel Diameter | 18 in | 17 in |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | P235/65R18 | P245/70R17 |
| Spare Tire Type | Temporary | — |
| Spare Tire Location | Inside Mounted | — |
Suspension
| Feature | Chevrolet | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | ✓ |
Warranty
| Feature | Chevrolet | Toyota |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. | 3 yr./ 36000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 6 yr./ 100000 mi. | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 5 yr./ 60000 mi. | 2 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance | 1 yr./ unlimited mi. | 2 yr./ 25000 mi. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Chevrolet Blazer and 2025 Toyota 4Runner.
How much more powerful is the 2025 Toyota 4Runner?
The 2025 Toyota 4Runner delivers 278 horsepower, providing a substantial 50 hp advantage over the 2025 Chevrolet Blazer's 228 hp output. This power difference translates directly into greater torque, with the 4Runner producing 317 lb-ft compared to the Blazer's 258 lb-ft.
Which vehicle is better for long-term fuel costs?
The 2025 Chevrolet Blazer is likely better for fuel costs, achieving 25 MPG combined versus the 4Runner's 22 MPG combined. However, note that the Blazer recommends premium unleaded fuel, which could offset some of those savings.
Is the size difference between the two vehicles significant?
Yes, the 2025 Toyota 4Runner is noticeably larger, standing 72.6 inches tall compared to the Blazer's 67.0 inches height, and it offers significantly more utility. The 4Runner boasts 48.4 cubic feet of cargo space while the Blazer only manages 30.5 cubic feet.
What is the primary driver for the $5,870 price gap?
The MSRP difference largely reflects the 4Runner's focus on rugged SUV capability and higher output, starting at $41,270 against the Blazer's $35,400. The 4Runner also utilizes a rear-wheel-drive platform, differing from the Blazer's standard front-wheel drive setup.
Which car uses cheaper fuel?
The 2025 Toyota 4Runner can run on regular unleaded fuel. Conversely, the 2025 Chevrolet Blazer specifies that premium unleaded is recommended for its performance, which may increase running costs.
How do the transmissions compare between these two vehicles?
Both vehicles feature automatic transmissions with multiple gears, but the Blazer uses a 9-speed shiftable automatic. The 4Runner utilizes an 8-speed shiftable automatic transmission.
More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool