2025 Audi Q3 vs 2026 Mazda CX-70

Audi Q3

$39,800 · Crossover

vs
Mazda CX-70

$42,250 · Crossover

Comparison Overview

The most significant numerical difference lies in the power output, with the 2026 Mazda CX-70 generating 280 hp and 332 lb-ft of torque, substantially outperforming the 2025 Audi Q3's 228 hp and 251 lb-ft. This power disparity is reflected in a higher MSRP for the Mazda, costing $42,250 compared to the Audi's $39,800. Despite the size difference—the CX-70 is 200.8 inches long versus the Q3's 176.6 inches—the Mazda achieves slightly better efficiency, delivering a combined 25 MPG compared to the Q3's 23 MPG, though both share 28 MPG on the highway. Furthermore, cargo capacity is a major differentiator; the CX-70 offers 39.6 cu ft, vastly surpassing the Q3's 23.7 cu ft of storage space. Both utilize an 8-speed shiftable automatic transmission and standard all-wheel drive.

Size Comparison

Performance

Fuel Efficiency

Full Specifications

Our Verdicts

🚗 Best for Commuters

2025 Audi Q3

The Audi Q3 offers a slightly lower curb presence and a negligible 2 MPG deficit in city driving (20 vs 24), making it marginally easier to navigate urban cores.

👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Best for Families

2026 Mazda CX-70

The 2026 Mazda CX-70 provides substantially more utility with 39.6 cu ft of cargo capacity, significantly exceeding the Q3's 23.7 cu ft.

🏎️ Best for Enthusiasts

2026 Mazda CX-70

The Mazda CX-70 dominates in performance metrics, boasting 280 hp and 332 lb-ft of torque, a significant advantage over the Q3's 228 hp.

💰 Best Value

2025 Audi Q3

The Audi Q3 achieves a lower barrier to entry with an MSRP of $39,800, undercutting the CX-70's $42,250 price point.

Choose the Audi Q3 if...

  • Budget is the primary constraint, as the Audi Q3 starts $2,450 less at $39,800.
  • Maneuverability and parking in tight city spaces are priorities due to its shorter 176.6-inch length.
  • Fuel economy remains critical despite a small difference, with the Q3 delivering 28 MPG highway versus the CX-70's identical highway rating.

Choose the Mazda CX-70 if...

  • Maximum cargo capacity is required, as the CX-70 offers 39.6 cu ft versus the Q3's 23.7 cu ft.
  • Performance is highly desired, given the CX-70's 280 hp and 332 lb-ft of torque output.
  • A larger vehicle footprint is acceptable, as the CX-70 measures 200.8 inches long and 68.2 inches high.

Key Dimensions

Dimension Audi Q3 Mazda CX-70
Length 176.6" 200.8"
Width 72.8" -
Height 62.9" 68.2"
Wheelbase 105.5" 122.8"

Features Comparison

Safety
Feature Audi Mazda
Blind Spot Monitor
Lane Departure Warning
Lane Keeping Assist System
Rear Cross Traffic Alert
Pre-Collision Safety System
Post-Collision Safety System
Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags
Front Head Airbags
Rear Head Airbags
Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation
Electronic Stability Control
Traction Control System
LATCH System
Rear Door Child Safety Locks
Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) 4-Wheel 4-Wheel
Front Ventilated Disc Brakes
Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes
Brake Assist
Tire Pressure Monitoring System
Automatic Headlights
Headlight Delay-Off
LED Headlights
Self-Leveling Headlights
Daytime Running Lights
Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors
Front Headrests 2 2
Front Multi-Adjustable Headrests
Rear Headrests 3 3
Rear Height Adjustable Headrests
Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt
Engine Immobilizer
Driver Attention Alert
Front Height Adjustable Headrests
Engine
Feature Audi Mazda
Base Engine Displacement 2.0 L 3.3 L
Number of Cylinders inline 4 inline 6
Base Engine Type gas mild hybrid
Horsepower 228 hp 280 hp @ 5000 rpm
Torque 251 lb-ft 332 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm
Number of Valves 16 24
Camshaft Type Double overhead cam (DOHC) Double overhead cam (DOHC)
Variable Valve Timing Variable Variable
Fuel Injection Type
Drive Train
Feature Audi Mazda
Transmission Type 8-speed shiftable automatic 8-speed shiftable automatic
Drivetrain Type all wheel drive all wheel drive
Center Differential Type Limited Slip Limited Slip
Hill Descent Control
Fuel
Feature Audi Mazda
Fuel Type regular unleaded regular unleaded
EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) 20/28 MPG 24/28 MPG
EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) 23 MPG 25 MPG
EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) 318.0/445.2 mi. 444.0/518.0 mi.
Fuel Tank Capacity 15.9 gal. 18.5 gal.
Comfort & Convenience
Feature Audi Mazda
Push Button Start
Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel
Transmission Controls on Steering Wheel
Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
Electric Power Steering
Rear View Camera
Front Parking Sensors
Rear Parking Sensors
Adaptive Cruise Control
Front Cupholders
Rear Cupholders
Front Door Pockets
Rear Door Pockets
Front Seatback Storage
Leather Steering Wheel
Three Zone Climate Control
Rear Ventilation Ducts with Fan Control
Interior Air Filtration
Dual Vanity Mirrors
Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors
Cruise Control on Steering Wheel
Wireless Charging Pad
Overhead Console with Storage
Heated Steering Wheel
In Car Entertainment
Feature Audi Mazda
Infotainment Display 10.1 in 12.3 in
AM/FM Stereo
Stereo Power 180W
Speaker System 10 8
Android Auto (Wired)
Apple CarPlay (Wired)
USB Port
USB Port with External Media Control
Android Auto (Wireless)
Apple CarPlay (Wireless)
Speed Sensitive Volume Control
Power Feature
Feature Audi Mazda
One-Touch Power Windows 4 4
Moonroof Type 1st Row Power Glass Extended 1st Row Power Glass
Remote Keyless Entry
Heated Mirrors
Keyless Entry
Frontseats
Feature Audi Mazda
Front Head Room 39.6 in. 39.7 in.
Front Leg Room 40.0 in. 41.7 in.
Front Shoulder Room 56.7 in. 59.2 in.
Seat Material: Leather
Front Seat Type: Bucket
Driver Seat Power Adjustments 8-way 8-way
Driver Seat Height Adjustment
Driver Seat Lumbar Support Power Power
Passenger Seat Power Adjustments 8-way 8-way
Passenger Seat Height Adjustment
Passenger Seat Lumbar Support Power
Driver Seat Heating Multi-level Multi-level
Passenger Seat Heating Multi-level Multi-level
Front Hip Room 56.2 in.
Driver Seat Memory Settings 2
Driver Seat Ventilation
Passenger Seat Ventilation
Rearseats
Feature Audi Mazda
Rear Head Room 37.6 in. 39.3 in.
Rear Leg Room 36.1 in. 39.4 in.
Rear Shoulder Room 55.1 in. 58.1 in.
Split-Folding Rear Seatback
Reclining Rear Seats
Folding Center Armrest
Rear Hip Room 55.5 in.
Heated Rear Seats (Multi-Level)
Tires and Wheels
Feature Audi Mazda
Wheel Material Alloy
Wheel Diameter 18 in
Tire Type All Season All Season
Tire Size 235/55R18 275/45R21
Spare Tire Type Temporary Temporary
Spare Tire Location Inside Mounted Inside Mounted
Wheel Finish Painted Alloy
Wheel Size 21 x 9.5 in.
Suspension
Feature Audi Mazda
Four-Wheel Independent Suspension
Front Stabilizer Bar
Rear Stabilizer Bar
Warranty
Feature Audi Mazda
Basic Warranty 4 yr./ 50000 mi. 3 yr./ 36000 mi.
Drivetrain Warranty 4 yr./ 50000 mi. 5 yr./ 60000 mi.
Corrosion/Rust Warranty 12 yr./ unlimited mi. 5 yr./ unlimited mi.
Roadside Assistance 4 yr./ unlimited mi. 3 yr./ 36000 mi.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about comparing the 2025 Audi Q3 and 2026 Mazda CX-70.

Which vehicle is more fuel-efficient overall?

The 2026 Mazda CX-70 edges out the Audi Q3 in overall fuel economy, achieving 25 MPG combined compared to the Q3's 23 MPG combined. Both vehicles achieve an identical 28 MPG rating on the highway cycle, and both use regular unleaded fuel.

How do the dimensions impact daily use between the two crossovers?

The 2026 Mazda CX-70 is significantly larger, measuring 200.8 inches long and 68.2 inches high, compared to the Audi Q3's 176.6 inches length and 62.9 inches height. This extra size in the Mazda directly translates to 15.9 cubic feet more cargo volume.

Is the higher cost of the Mazda CX-70 justified by the power difference?

The Mazda CX-70 costs $2,450 more ($42,250 vs $39,800) and delivers 52 more horsepower (280 hp vs 228 hp) and 81 more lb-ft of torque (332 vs 251). Enthusiasts valuing straight-line acceleration will find this justified by the superior output figures.

Do these vehicles have the same type of drivetrain?

Yes, both the 2025 Audi Q3 and the 2026 Mazda CX-70 come standard with All-Wheel Drive (AWD) and utilize an 8-speed shiftable automatic transmission.

How much space difference is there for loading cargo?

The 2026 Mazda CX-70 offers a substantially larger storage area at 39.6 cu ft. The 2025 Audi Q3 trails significantly with only 23.7 cu ft of cargo capacity available behind the rear seats.

What is the difference in city MPG ratings?

The Mazda CX-70 provides better city efficiency at 24 MPG, while the Audi Q3 is rated slightly lower at 20 MPG in city driving conditions. This 4 MPG difference in stop-and-go traffic could impact daily commuter running costs.

More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)

View all

Vehicle Details

Compare More Vehicles

Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once

Open Comparison Tool