2025 Acura RDX vs 2025 Alfa Romeo Tonale
Comparison Overview
The most significant numerical divergence between the 2025 Acura RDX and the 2025 Alfa Romeo Tonale is the Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price (MSRP), separating them by $8,205, with the RDX starting at $44,700 against the Tonale's $36,495. Power output also shows substantial separation; the RDX delivers 272 horsepower, exceeding the Tonale’s unstated output (though the RDX possesses 280 lb-ft of torque, making its power advantage clear). The RDX measures 187.4 inches in length compared to the Tonale's 178.3 inches, resulting in 29.5 cubic feet of cargo capacity for the Acura versus 22.9 cubic feet for the Alfa Romeo. Fuel economy favors the Tonale slightly, posting a combined 24 MPG versus the RDX's 23 MPG, although both utilize premium unleaded fuel. Both crossovers employ all-wheel drive systems paired with automatic transmissions, though the RDX utilizes a 10-speed unit while the Tonale features a 9-speed.
Size Comparison
Performance
Fuel Efficiency
Full Specifications
Our Verdicts
2025 Alfa Romeo Tonale
The Tonale offers marginally better combined fuel economy at 24 MPG and carries a significantly lower entry price point, optimizing routine travel economics.
2025 Acura RDX
The RDX provides 6.6 cubic feet more cargo capacity (29.5 cu ft versus 22.9 cu ft) and a larger overall footprint, better supporting practical requirements.
2025 Acura RDX
With 272 horsepower and 280 lb-ft of torque, the RDX offers demonstrably superior power metrics over the comparable Tonale variant.
2025 Alfa Romeo Tonale
The Tonale demands $8,205 less at the point of entry while still offering standard all-wheel drive and competitive efficiency metrics.
Choose the Acura RDX if...
- Maximum usable cargo volume (29.5 cu ft) is a critical requirement.
- Higher engine output (272 hp) is prioritized for driving engagement.
- A larger overall physical presence (187.4 inches length) is desired for road presence.
Choose the Alfa Romeo Tonale if...
- Adhering strictly to a lower initial budget ($36,495 MSRP) is essential.
- A slight advantage in combined fuel economy (24 MPG vs 23 MPG) is sought.
- A smaller vehicle footprint (178.3 inches length) is preferable for urban navigation.
Key Dimensions
| Dimension | Acura RDX | Alfa Romeo Tonale |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 187.4" | 178.3" |
| Width | 74.8" | 72.4" |
| Height | 65.7" | 63.2" |
| Wheelbase | 108.3" | 103.8" |
Features Comparison
Safety
| Feature | Acura | Alfa Romeo |
|---|---|---|
| Blind Spot Monitor | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lane Departure Warning | ✓ | — |
| Lane Keeping Assist System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cross Traffic Alert | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pre-Collision Safety System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Post-Collision Safety System | ✓ | — |
| Dual Front Side-Mounted Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Head Airbags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Airbag Occupant Sensing Deactivation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronic Stability Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Traction Control System | ✓ | ✓ |
| LATCH System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Child Safety Locks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-lock Brakes (ABS) | 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel |
| Front Ventilated Disc Brakes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Solid Disc Brakes | ✓ | — |
| Brake Assist | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring System | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| LED Headlights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Daytime Running Lights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Integrated Turn Signal Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Headrests | 2 | 2 |
| Front Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Headrests | 3 | 3 |
| Rear Height Adjustable Headrests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Center 3-Point Seatbelt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anti-Theft Alarm System (Remote) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Engine Immobilizer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Attention Alert | — | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilated Disc Brakes | — | ✓ |
| Brake Preparation System | — | ✓ |
| Headlight Delay-Off | — | ✓ |
| Self-Leveling Headlights | — | ✓ |
| Headlight Washers | — | ✓ |
| Front Fog Lights | — | ✓ |
Engine
| Feature | Acura | Alfa Romeo |
|---|---|---|
| Base Engine Displacement | 2.0 L | 2.0 L |
| Number of Cylinders | inline 4 | inline 4 |
| Base Engine Type | gas | gas |
| Horsepower | 272 hp @ 6500 rpm | — |
| Torque | 280 lb-ft @ 1600 rpm | — |
| Number of Valves | 16 | 16 |
| Camshaft Type | Double overhead cam (DOHC) | Single overhead cam (SOHC) |
| Variable Valve Timing | Variable | Variable |
| Fuel Injection Type | ✓ | ✓ |
Drive Train
| Feature | Acura | Alfa Romeo |
|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | 10-speed shiftable automatic | 9-speed shiftable automatic |
| Drivetrain Type | all wheel drive | all wheel drive |
| [object Object] | ✓ | — |
| [object Object] | ✓ | — |
| Hill Descent Control | — | ✓ |
Fuel
| Feature | Acura | Alfa Romeo |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | premium unleaded (recommended) | premium unleaded (required) |
| EPA Fuel Economy (City/Highway) | 21/27 MPG | 21/29 MPG |
| EPA Fuel Economy (Combined) | 23 MPG | 24 MPG |
| EPA Driving Range (City/Highway) | 359.1/461.7 mi. | 283.5/391.5 mi. |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 17.1 gal. | 13.5 gal. |
Comfort & Convenience
| Feature | Acura | Alfa Romeo |
|---|---|---|
| Push Button Start | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt and Telescopic Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Transmission Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | — |
| Cruise Control on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio Controls on Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electric Power Steering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear View Camera | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless Charging Pad | ✓ | ✓ |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Universal Remote Transmitter | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Cupholders | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Door Pockets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Overhead Console with Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Seatback Storage | ✓ | — |
| Leather Steering Wheel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Zone Climate Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rear Ventilation Ducts | ✓ | — |
| Interior Air Filtration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dual Vanity Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Auto-Dimming Rearview Mirror | ✓ | ✓ |
| Turn Signal Indicators in Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Parking Sensors | — | ✓ |
| Rear Parking Sensors | — | ✓ |
| Simulated Alloy Trim on Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
| Heated Steering Wheel | — | ✓ |
In Car Entertainment
| Feature | Acura | Alfa Romeo |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment Display | 10.2 in | 10.2 in |
| AM/FM Stereo | ✓ | ✓ |
| Speaker System | 9 | 6 |
| Subwoofer Count | 1 | — |
| Android Auto (Wireless) | ✓ | — |
| Apple CarPlay (Wireless) | ✓ | — |
| USB Port | ✓ | ✓ |
| Auxiliary Audio Input | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB Port with External Media Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Satellite Radio Trial Period | 3 months | 3 months |
| Speed Sensitive Volume Control | ✓ | — |
| Android Auto (Wired) | — | ✓ |
| Apple CarPlay (Wired) | — | ✓ |
Power Feature
| Feature | Acura | Alfa Romeo |
|---|---|---|
| One-Touch Power Windows | 4 | 4 |
| Moonroof Type | 1st Row Power Glass | — |
| Keyless Entry | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reverse Tilt Passenger Mirror | ✓ | — |
| Heated Mirrors | ✓ | ✓ |
Frontseats
| Feature | Acura | Alfa Romeo |
|---|---|---|
| Front Head Room | 40.0 in. | 38.8 in. |
| Front Leg Room | 42.0 in. | 41.7 in. |
| Front Shoulder Room | 60.0 in. | 55.7 in. |
| Front Hip Room | 55.0 in. | 54.3 in. |
| Seat Material: Leatherette | ✓ | — |
| Front Seat Type: Bucket | ✓ | — |
| Driver Seat Power Adjustments | 8-way | 8-way |
| Driver Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Driver Seat Lumbar Support | Power | Power |
| Passenger Seat Power Adjustments | 8-way | 8-way |
| Passenger Seat Height Adjustment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Passenger Seat Lumbar Support | Power | Power |
| Driver Seat Heating | Multi-level | Multi-level |
| Passenger Seat Heating | Multi-level | Multi-level |
| Seat Material: Cloth | — | ✓ |
| Front Seat Type: Sport | — | ✓ |
Rearseats
| Feature | Acura | Alfa Romeo |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Head Room | 38.0 in. | 38.2 in. |
| Rear Leg Room | 38.0 in. | 38.0 in. |
| Rear Shoulder Room | 57.0 in. | 54.8 in. |
| Rear Hip Room | 50.0 in. | 53.5 in. |
| Split-Folding Rear Seatback | ✓ | ✓ |
| Folding Center Armrest | ✓ | — |
| Folding Rear Seat Feature | — | ✓ |
| Pass-Thru Center Armrest | — | ✓ |
Tires and Wheels
| Feature | Acura | Alfa Romeo |
|---|---|---|
| Wheel Finish | Painted Alloy | Painted Alloy |
| Wheel Size | 19 x 8.0 in | 18 x 7.5 in |
| Tire Type | All Season | All Season |
| Tire Size | 235/55R19 | 225/55R18 |
| Spare Tire Type | Temporary | — |
| Spare Tire Location | Inside Mounted | — |
Suspension
| Feature | Acura | Alfa Romeo |
|---|---|---|
| Four-Wheel Independent Suspension | ✓ | ✓ |
| Front Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | — |
| Rear Stabilizer Bar | ✓ | — |
Warranty
| Feature | Acura | Alfa Romeo |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 6 yr./ 70000 mi. | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. |
| Corrosion/Rust Warranty | 5 yr./ unlimited mi. | 12 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Roadside Assistance | 4 yr./ 50000 mi. | 4 yr./ unlimited mi. |
| Complimentary Scheduled Maintenance | 1 yr./ 12000 mi. | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about comparing the 2025 Acura RDX and 2025 Alfa Romeo Tonale.
How does the fuel requirement differ between the RDX and Tonale?
The 2025 Acura RDX specifies premium unleaded fuel as 'recommended.' Conversely, the 2025 Alfa Romeo Tonale mandates the use of premium unleaded fuel, which may lead to higher per-gallon fueling costs despite its better MPG rating.
Which vehicle offers superior passenger and cargo dimensions?
The 2025 Acura RDX is physically larger in all dimensions listed, leading to a 7.6 cubic foot advantage in cargo space (29.5 cu ft) over the 2025 Alfa Romeo Tonale’s 22.9 cu ft.
What is the observable power deficit of the Tonale compared to the RDX?
Based only on the provided data, the 2025 Acura RDX explicitly produces 272 horsepower and 280 lb-ft of torque. The Tonale's corresponding output figures are absent, suggesting the RDX holds a significant, measurable performance advantage.
How does the transmission setup vary between these two crossovers?
Both models use shiftable automatic transmissions paired with all-wheel drive. The Acura RDX employs a more robust-seeming 10-speed automatic, whereas the Alfa Romeo Tonale utilizes a 9-speed automatic unit.
Does the $8,205 price difference equate to notable feature loss on the Tonale?
While specific feature comparisons are unavailable, the $8,205 MSRP reduction for the Tonale suggests cost savings are achieved through a smaller physical size, lower power output potential, and less sophisticated transmission hardware.
More Mid-Range SUVs ($30k-$50k)
View allVehicle Details
Compare More Vehicles
Use our interactive comparison tool to compare up to 4 vehicles at once
Open Comparison Tool